Bringing Psilocybin-Assisted Therapy to Palliative Oncology: Early Lessons from Real-World Implementation.
Michel Dorval, Virginie Audet-Croteau, Sue-Ling Chang, Marianne Masse-Grenier, Annie Tremblay, Elodie Bénard, Alexandra Chapdelaine, Nicolas Garel, Jason Robert Guertin
Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) June 3, 2026 DOI: 10.3390/healthcare14111559 via PubMed
Summary
AI-generated from the abstractAfter one year of offering psilocybin-assisted therapy (PAT) at a Canadian university-affiliated tertiary care center, no patients had received the treatment despite clinicians and managers viewing it favorably. Interviews with ten professionals identified administrative and regulatory procedures, along with logistical constraints, as key barriers, while perceived clinical relevance and institutional leadership were facilitators. The estimated cost of delivering a complete PAT intervention ranged from 2,648 to 5,827 Canadian dollars per patient, excluding the cost of psilocybin itself. The gap between regulatory authorization and actual service uptake highlights the need for structured implementation strategies, sustained institutional support, and alignment between regulatory frameworks and clinical workflows.
Study at a glance
| Characteristics | Single-case implementation study Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Sample size | 10 |
| Population | Clinicians, managers, and other stakeholders at a university-affiliated tertiary care center in Canada |
| Intervention | Psilocybin-assisted therapy |
| Duration | One year |
| Topics | End-of-life distress |
| Keywords | Cost analysis Implementation Palliative care Psilocybin-assisted therapy |
| Key finding | Despite favorable views and modest estimated costs, no patients received psilocybin-assisted therapy after one year, indicating a gap between regulatory authorization and effective service uptake. |
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Psilocybin-assisted therapy (PAT) is a promising intervention to alleviate existential distress among patients with advanced cancer receiving palliative care. However, evidence on how to integrate PAT into routine oncology and palliative care services remains scarce. This study aimed to examine real-world PAT implementation, identify factors influencing adoption, and estimate integration costs within oncology and palliative care services. Methods: We conducted a single-case implementation study in a large university-affiliated tertiary care center in Canada during the first year following its introduction. Semi-structured interviews with clinicians, managers, and other stakeholders explored barriers, facilitating conditions, and actions needed to support PAT implementation. A budget impact analysis estimated incremental costs associated with delivering PAT. Results: After one year, no patients had received PAT. Ten professionals representing diverse clinical and managerial roles participated in the interviews. While participants viewed PAT favorably, they emphasized the need to align the intervention with existing care pathways and clarify referral processes. Administrative and regulatory procedures, together with logistical constraints related to treatment delivery, were identified as key barriers, whereas perceived clinical relevance and institutional leadership were seen as important facilitators. From the health care system perspective, the estimated cost of delivering a complete PAT intervention ranged from 2648 to 5827 Canadian dollars (CAD) per patient, depending on the scenario examined, excluding the cost of the psilocybin itself. Conclusions: Despite perceived clinical relevance and relatively modest estimated costs, the absence of treated patients after one year highlights the gap between regulatory authorization and effective service uptake. These findings underscore the importance of structured implementation strategies, sustained institutional support, and alignment between regulatory frameworks and clinical workflows to ensure meaningful integration of PAT into routine oncology and palliative care services.