Skip to content

Reframing Self, Identity, and Subjectivity Through Metaqualia Theory: a Structural Grammar of Consciousness

Minoru Matsui

Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science November 15, 2025 DOI: 10.1007/s12124-025-09938-z via Springer Nature

Summary

AI-generated from the abstract

Metaqualia Theory (MTQ) provides a structural grammar that treats self, identity, and subjectivity not as fixed entities but as derivative effects of a cycle involving Qualia (raw experience), Metaqualia (interpretive stances), and Transduction (stabilization through social and communicative fields). The self is the retrospective label applied when a stabilized Metaqualia stance is established; identity is the socially recognized continuity of such stabilizations; and subjectivity is the conventional name for Qualia framed by Metaqualia. MTQ distinguishes these terms systematically, avoids homuncular explanations, and differentiates itself from dialogical and constructivist models by specifying the structural conditions under which these labels arise. It offers a coherent conceptual lexicon for psychology and philosophy.

Study at a glance

Characteristics Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed
Keywords Metaqualia theory mtq Self Identity Subjectivity Agency
Citations 4
Key finding Self, identity, and subjectivity are not intrinsic entities but derivative effects of the Q–M–T cycle: Qualia, Metaqualia, and Transduction.

Abstract

This paper addresses the longstanding ambiguity of terms such as self , identity , and subjectivity in psychology and philosophy. Rather than adding yet another definition, it introduces Metaqualia Theory (MTQ) as a structural grammar that generates these notions as derivative effects of the Q–M–T cycle: Qualia (Q) as raw experiential material, Metaqualia (M) as interpretive stances, and Transduction (T) as the stabilization of experience in social and communicative fields. Within this framework, “self” is not an intrinsic entity but the retrospective label applied when an active M is stabilized through T; “identity” denotes the socially recognized continuity of such stabilizations; and “subjectivity” is the conventional name given when Q is framed by M. MTQ thereby systematically distinguishes between self, identity, and subjectivity, while avoiding homuncular explanations. It also differentiates itself from dialogical and constructivist models by specifying structural conditions under which these labels arise, rather than assuming them as givens. The result is a coherent conceptual lexicon that integrates existing insights without collapsing into definitional disputes. MTQ thus offers psychology a grammar of consciousness capable of clarifying key terms and situating them within a unified structural account.

Comments

No comments yet.

Log in to comment