Thinking about hallucinations: why philosophy matters.
Sam Wilkinson, Huw Green, Stephanie Hare, Joseph Houlders, Clara Humpston, Benjamin Alderson-Day
Cognitive neuropsychiatry January 1, 2022 DOI: 10.1080/13546805.2021.2007067 via PubMed
Summary
AI-generated from the abstractPhilosophy contributes to hallucinations research in three distinct ways. Phenomenology provides a sophisticated, critical understanding of the lived experience of hallucinations. Philosophy of cognitive science enables big-picture theorizing, synthesis of ideas, and critical engagement with new paradigms. Philosophy of science and psychiatry raises theoretically informed questions about diagnosis and categorization. These contributions reflect philosophy's methodological variety and its relevance to hallucinations researchers.
Study at a glance
| Characteristics | Review Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Topics | Philosophy of mind |
| Keywords | Hallucinations Philosophy Psychosis |
| Citations | 8 |
| Key finding | Philosophy makes significant contributions to hallucinations research through phenomenology, philosophy of cognitive science, and philosophy of science and psychiatry. |
Abstract
Introduction: Hallucinations research is increasingly incorporating philosophy or the work of philosophically trained individuals. We present three different ways in which this is successfully implemented to the enhancement of knowledge and understanding of hallucinations and related phenomena.Method: We review contributions from phenomenology, philosophy of cognitive science, and philosophy of science and psychiatry.Results: We demonstrate that these areas of philosophy make significant contributions to hallucinations research. Phenomenology gives us a sophisticated and critical understanding of the lived experience of hallucinations. Philosophy of cognitive science enables big-picture theorising and synthesis of ideas, as well as a critical engagement with new paradigms. Philosophy of science and psychiatry raises valuable and theoretically informed questions about diagnosis and categorisation.Conclusions: These contributions reflect both the methodological variety within philosophy and its relevance to the hallucinations researcher.