Skip to content

Contemplative practices serve as complementary mental health strategies in nationally representative samples from Australia and New Zealand

Karin Matko, Cate Bailey, Julieta Galante, Jonathan N. Davies, Nicholas T. van Dam

Scientific Reports May 19, 2026 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-026-51375-4 via OpenAlex

Summary

AI-generated from the abstract

Seventy percent of adults in Australia and New Zealand engaged in contemplative practices such as meditation, yoga, or breathing techniques in the past year, most commonly meditation (31%). Practitioners reported higher psychological distress and greater use of mental healthcare than non-practitioners. After adjusting for sociodemographic differences, the association with distress disappeared for yoga and relaxation practitioners but remained for breathing techniques, which were linked to increased distress in all models. Among those with unmet healthcare needs, meditators and relaxation practitioners reported less distress than non-practitioners with unmet needs. The findings suggest contemplative practices may serve as complements to mental healthcare, but their complex relationships with mental health require further study.

Study at a glance

Characteristics Cross-sectional survey Preregistered Peer reviewed
Sample size 2,640
Population Adults in Australia and New Zealand
Topics Meditation
Keywords Contemplation Mental distress Psychological distress
Key finding Contemplative practice users reported higher psychological distress and mental healthcare use than non-practitioners, but associations varied by practice type and were partly explained by sociodemographic factors and healthcare access.

Abstract

Abstract Contemplative practices (including meditation and yoga) are increasingly popular worldwide, especially as alternatives and/or complements to mental health treatment. However, nationally representative samples that allow for accurate estimates of prevalence and relation to mental health are scarce. We conducted a nationally representative, cross-sectional survey in Australia and New Zealand ( N = 2640). Sampling was stratified by age, gender, ancestry/ethnicity, region and income. Two pre-registered questions were analysed to explore participants’ engagement in contemplative practices and associations to psychological distress and mental healthcare use. We used posthoc regression analyses to further clarify relationships between variables. Overall, 70% of participants engaged in contemplative practices over the past year, most commonly meditation (31%), relaxation (25%), breathing techniques (24%), and yoga (21%). Improving health and wellbeing were the primary motivations for practice. All contemplative practice users reported significantly higher psychological distress and mental healthcare use than non-practitioners ( p ’s<0.05). Adjusting for sociodemographic differences removed associations with distress among yoga and relaxation practitioners (β relaxation = 0.02, β yoga = − 0.03, n.s. ). For meditators, the association disappeared when we accounted for mental healthcare use (β meditation = 0.01, n.s. ). Breathing practice was associated with increased distress in all models (β breathing = 0.04–0.11, p’s< 0.05). Notably, meditators and relaxation practitioners with unmet healthcare needs reported less distress than non-practitioners with unmet needs ( d meditation =0.38, d relaxation =0.35). Contemplative practices are widespread among Australians and New Zealanders and may play a complementary and/or alternative role in managing mental health. Further research is needed to study their complex associations with mental health, and which types of contemplative practices are beneficial and safe for whom.

Explore topics

Comments

No comments yet.

Log in to comment