The social origins of consciousness.
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci November 13, 2025 DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2024.0300 via PubMed Central
Summary
AI-generated from the abstractThe social origins of consciousness hypothesis proposes that the original adaptive function of consciousness was to enable coordination with group members. Three arguments support this: a phylogenetic argument that consciousness is widespread among animals and likely evolved early to solve the problem of predicting others' behavior and staying together as a group during the Cambrian; a neuroscience argument that even simple brains have capacities for social rewards and pains, with modern brains retaining close connections between social cognition and affect; and an argument from deep adaptive alignment between social pain and harm to animals, building on William James (1890).
Study at a glance
| Characteristics | Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Citations | 3 |
| Key finding | The original adaptive function of consciousness was to enable coordination with group members, supported by phylogenetic, neuroscience, and behavioral evidence. |
Abstract
We present the social origins of consciousness hypothesis, according to which the ability to coordinate with group members was the original adaptive function of consciousness. We offer three arguments. The phylogenetic argument presumes that consciousness is widespread among existing animals, and that widespread capacities are probably evolutionarily old. Early animals relied on consciousness to solve a problem that arose during the Cambrian, when animals first became behaviourally flexible-how to predict others' behaviour and stay together as a group. The argument from neuroscience points to evidence that even very simple brains have the capacities for social rewards and pains, and that modern brains retain close connections between the substrates for social cognition and affect. The deep adaptive alignment between social pain and harm to animals develops an argument originally proposed by William James (1890). We provide evidence that in preference tests, bodily pain is preferred to social pain in a wide range of species. We offer two approaches to testing the hypothesis-the salience of social stimuli test and the overattribution of agency test. Working under the social origins of consciousness hypothesis could lead to significant breakthroughs in research, especially by focusing on simpler systems than are currently studied.This article is part of the theme issue 'Evolutionary functions of consciousness'.