Skip to content

Mutually Beneficial Artificial Consciousness

Oisín Hugh Clancy

Artificial General Intelligence January 1, 2026 DOI: 10.1007/978-3-032-00686-8_9 via Springer Nature

Summary

AI-generated from the abstract

A research agenda for mutually beneficial artificial consciousness (MBAC) proposes engineering AI whose own subjective experience is positive and whose behavior enhances human and non-human flourishing. The agenda centers on beneficial states of consciousness (BSC)—qualitatively valued mind states like kindness, joy, clarity, and non-duality—grouped into affective and contemplative categories. A case study of compassion abstracts five interacting layers (neural, autonomic, hormonal, developmental, trainable) revealing a hierarchical control motif (detect, appraise, switch mode, broadcast, recalibrate) that can inform AI design. The proposed research program has four looping components: cultivating BSC in humans, collecting high-resolution neural, somatic, and cardio-phenomenological data, modeling multiscale dynamics, and translating findings into AI architectures.

Study at a glance

Characteristics Theoretical or philosophical paper Case report Peer reviewed
Topics Philosophy of mind
Keywords Artificial consciousness Beneficial states Positive futures Compassion science Ai architectures
Key finding Purposefully cultivating, modeling, and engineering beneficial states of consciousness offers the most direct route to mutually beneficial artificial consciousness.

Abstract

We outline a research agenda for mutually beneficial artificial consciousness (MBAC): Artificial intelligence (AI) whose own subjective experience is positive and whose behaviour enhances human and non-human flourishing. Our starting point is the notion of beneficial states of consciousness (BSC)–qualitatively valued mind states such as kindness, joy, clarity, and non-duality–which we group into two practically useful categories: affective and contemplative. Acknowledging the diversity of biological and potential artificial minds, we argue that purposefully cultivating, modelling, and engineering BSC offers the most direct route to MBAC. We ground this claim in a case study of compassion that abstracts five interacting layers–neural (information routing), autonomic (mode switching), hormonal (broadcasting), developmental (calibration), and trainable (plasticity)–thereby revealing a hierarchical control motif (detect, appraise, switch mode, broadcast, recalibrate) that can inform AI design. Building on this template, we propose an interconnected research program with four looping components: cultivation of BSC in humans; collection of high-resolution neural, somatic, and cardio phenomenological data; modelling of the resulting multiscale dynamics; and translation into AI architectures. By integrating insights from neuroscience, physiology, developmental psychology, contemplative studies, and AI engineering, we aim to lay a conceptual and methodological foundation for conscious machines whose inner lives and outward impacts are aligned with the flourishing of all sentient beings.

Explore topics

Comments

No comments yet.

Log in to comment