Comparing the characteristics of hallucinations and mental imagery: a large cross-sectional study in the general population.
Guillaume Pepin, Hélène Lœvenbruck, Alan Chauvin, Camille Jacquet, Jean-Baptiste Eichenlaub, Catherine Bortolon
Consciousness and cognition January 1, 2026 DOI: 10.1016/j.concog.2025.103974 via PubMed
Summary
AI-generated from the abstractHallucinations and involuntary mental imagery share many features but differ in key ways. In a survey of 1,951 French-speaking adults, involuntary mental imagery occurred more often than hallucinations and was rated as more vivid, emotionally positive, and self-generated. Hallucinations, by contrast, caused greater distress and were perceived as coming from outside the self. Moderate to strong correlations between the two on most dimensions support the idea of a shared experiential continuum, though differences in agency and controllability challenge existing cognitive models of self-monitoring. Refining these distinctions may improve early detection and prevention of distressing internal experiences.
Study at a glance
| Characteristics | Cross-sectional study Preregistered Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Sample size | 1,951 |
| Population | French-speaking adults |
| Topics | Philosophy of mind |
| Keywords | Continuum of experience Hallucinations Inner experience Mental imagery |
| Key finding | Involuntary mental imagery is more frequent, vivid, and self-generated than hallucinations, while hallucinations are more distressing and externally attributed, supporting a shared experiential continuum with distinct phenomenological profiles. |
Abstract
Hallucinations (HAs), the perceptual experiences that occur without external stimuli, are classically associated with psychiatric disorders, but also occur in the general population. Involuntary mental imagery (IMI), the spontaneous occurrence of visual or auditory mental content, shares several features with HAs. The continuum hypothesis suggests that these phenomena exist on a spectrum ranging from benign to clinically significant experiences. However, the precise boundaries of these phenomena remain under-explored. This pre-registered cross-sectional study focusing on the experiential continuum, involved 1,951 French-speaking adults who completed an online questionnaire assessing the frequency and characteristics of their HAs and IMI experiences. These experiences could include hearing music or voices, or seeing shadows. Participants rated ten phenomenologically-informed dimensions, including vividness, emotional valence, controllability, distress, agency, and perceived location. Associations were tested using Spearman correlations and Wilcoxon tests with Bonferroni correction. IMIs were significantly more frequent than HAs and were rated as more vivid, emotionally positive, and self-generated. In contrast, HAs were associated with greater distress and external attribution. Moderate to strong correlations between HAs and IMIs on most dimensions support the hypothesis of a shared experiential continuum. However, the fact that confidence and agency cannot be fully separated from controllability raises questions about cognitive models of self-monitoring and metacognition. These findings provide empirical evidence for both convergence and divergence in the phenomenological profiles of HAs and IMIs. Refining these distinctions could enhance theoretical models of hallucinatory experiences and facilitate the early identification and prevention of distressing internal phenomena in individuals at risk.