Is pain representational?
Belgrade Philosophical Annual July 12, 2024 DOI: 10.5937/bpa2302025a via DOAJ
Summary
AI-generated from the abstractStrong representationalism, a dominant view in philosophy of perception, comes in reductive and non-reductive forms, typically paired with realist and irrealist commitments respectively. This paper develops a simple, largely empirical argument against the realist reductive version and then extends that argument to cover irrealist representationalism. The argument targets the core claims of these positions without relying on specialized proprietary concepts, instead drawing on empirical considerations to challenge their adequacy.
Study at a glance
| Characteristics | Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Keywords | Strong representationalism Transparency Pain experience Edenic properties Proprietary concepts |
| Key finding | A largely empirical argument can be mounted against both realist reductive and irrealist versions of strong representationalism. |
Abstract
Representationalism in philosophy of perception has become more or less the dominant view. There are various versions of it not all of which are motivated by the same set of concerns. In this paper, I will focus on what has come to be known as strong representationalism. This view has reductive and non-reductive versions, which are usually paired with realist and irrealist versions respectively. Here, first, I will develop a simple, largely empirical, argument against realist reductive version. Later, rather more briefly, I will extend the argument to cover irrealist representationalism.