Interoceptive awareness in experienced meditators
Sahib S. Khalsa, David Rudrauf, António R. Damásio, Richard J. Davidson, Antoine Lutz, Daniel Tranel
Psychophysiology May 22, 2008 DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2008.00666.x via OpenAlex
Summary
AI-generated from the abstractMeditation traditions claim that paying attention to internal body sensations increases awareness of them, but scientific evidence is lacking. Experienced meditators (Tibetan Buddhist and Kundalini) were compared to nonmeditators matched for age and body mass index on a heartbeat detection task, a standard measure of interoceptive awareness. Contrary to predictions, meditators showed no superior performance across several sessions and respiratory conditions. However, meditators consistently rated their interoceptive performance as better and the task as easier. These results suggest that practicing attention to internal body sensations, a core feature of meditation, does not enhance the ability to sense the heartbeat at rest.
Study at a glance
| Characteristics | Observational cohort Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Population | Experienced meditators (Tibetan Buddhist and Kundalini) and nonmeditators |
| Topics | Meditation |
| Keywords | Interoception Heartbeat Cognitive psychology Task project management |
| Citations | 276 |
| Key finding | Meditators showed no superior performance on heartbeat detection compared to nonmeditators, despite rating their interoceptive performance as superior and the task as easier. |
Abstract
Attention to internal body sensations is practiced in most meditation traditions. Many traditions state that this practice results in increased awareness of internal body sensations, but scientific studies evaluating this claim are lacking. We predicted that experienced meditators would display performance superior to that of nonmeditators on heartbeat detection, a standard noninvasive measure of resting interoceptive awareness. We compared two groups of meditators (Tibetan Buddhist and Kundalini) to an age- and body mass index-matched group of nonmeditators. Contrary to our prediction, we found no evidence that meditators were superior to nonmeditators in the heartbeat detection task, across several sessions and respiratory modulation conditions. Compared to nonmeditators, however, meditators consistently rated their interoceptive performance as superior and the difficulty of the task as easier. These results provide evidence against the notion that practicing attention to internal body sensations, a core feature of meditation, enhances the ability to sense the heartbeat at rest.