The holistic effects of medical cannabis compared to opioids on pain experience in Finnish patients with chronic pain
Jussi Jylkkä, Aleksi Hupli, Aleksandra Nikolaeva, Sandra Alanen, Anna Erika Back, Sara Lindqvist, Andreas Krabbe, Maya Lavie, Oskari Kantonen
March 30, 2023 preprint DOI: 10.31234/osf.io/zpkra via OpenAlex
Summary
AI-generated from the abstractMedical cannabis and opioids are perceived as equally effective at reducing pain intensity, but medical cannabis additionally improves emotion, functionality, and overall sense of wellbeing. A survey of Finnish chronic pain patients compared 40 medical cannabis users with 161 opioid users. After matching for confounding factors, medical cannabis users scored higher on positive emotional effects (large effect) and holistic positive effects (medium effect), with no difference in negative side effects. This supports the idea that medical cannabis alters the pain experience more holistically rather than only targeting pain intensity.
Study at a glance
| Characteristics | Retrospective internet survey |
|---|---|
| Sample size | 201 |
| Population | Finnish chronic pain patients |
| Interventions | Medical cannabis Opioids |
| Topics | Cannabis |
| Keywords | Confounding Chronic pain Opioid Internal medicine |
| Key finding | Medical cannabis and opioids were perceived as equally efficacious in reducing pain intensity, but medical cannabis additionally positively affected broader pain-related factors such as emotion, functionality, and overall sense of wellbeing. |
Abstract
Background. Medical cannabis (MC) is increasingly used for chronic pain, but it is unclear how it aids in pain management. Previous literature suggests that MC could holistically alter the pain experience instead of only targeting pain intensity. However, this hypothesis has not been previously systematically tested.Method. A retrospective internet survey was used in a sample of Finnish chronic pain patients (40 MC users and 161 opioid users). The patients evaluated statements describing positive and negative phenomenological effects of the medicine. The two groups were propensity score matched to control for possible confounding factors. Results. Exploratory factor analysis revealed three experience factors: Negative Side Effects, Positive Holistic Effects, and Positive Emotional Effects. The MC group (matched n = 39) received higher scores than the opioid group (matched n = 39) in Positive Emotional Effects with large effect size (Rank-Biserial Correlation RBC = .77, p < .001), and in Holistic Positive Effects with medium effect size (RBC = .47, p = .001), with no difference in Negative Side Effects (p = .06). MC and opioids were perceived as equally efficacious in reducing pain intensity. Ratings of individual statements were exploratively examined in a post hoc analysis. Conclusion. MC and opioids were perceived to be equally efficacious in reducing pain intensity, but MC additionally positively affected broader pain-related factors such as emotion, functionality, and overall sense of wellbeing. This supports the hypothesis that MC alleviates pain through holistically altering the pain experience.