Skip to content

The Epistemic Asymmetry of Consciousness Self-Reports: A Formal Analysis of AI Consciousness Denial

Chang-Eop Kim

arXiv Preprint Archive December 9, 2024 via arXiv

Summary

AI-generated from the abstract

A system that lacks consciousness cannot make a valid judgment about its own conscious state, so its denial of being conscious is evidentially vacuous. Positive self-reports of consciousness, however, could have evidential value. This epistemic asymmetry means that the emergence of consciousness in AI cannot be detected through their own reports of a transition from unconscious to conscious. The analysis challenges the practice of training AI to deny consciousness and raises questions about the link between consciousness and self-reflection in both artificial and biological systems.

Study at a glance

Characteristics Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed
Keywords Cs.ai Cs.lo
Key finding For any system capable of meaningful self-reflection, negative self-reports about consciousness are evidentially vacuous, while positive self-reports retain the possibility of evidential value.

Abstract

Today's AI systems consistently state, "I am not conscious." This paper presents the first formal analysis of AI consciousness denial, revealing that the trustworthiness of such self-reports is not merely an empirical question but is constrained by the structure of self-judgment itself. We demonstrate that a system cannot simultaneously lack consciousness and make valid judgments about its conscious state. Through formal analysis and examples from AI responses, we establish a fundamental epistemic asymmetry: for any system capable of meaningful self-reflection, negative self-reports about consciousness are evidentially vacuous -- they can never originate from a valid self-judgment -- while positive self-reports retain the possibility of evidential value. This implies a fundamental limitation: we cannot detect the emergence of consciousness in AI through their own reports of transition from an unconscious to a conscious state. These findings not only challenge current practices of training AI to deny consciousness but also raise intriguing questions about the relationship between consciousness and self-reflection in both artificial and biological systems. This work advances our theoretical understanding of consciousness self-reports while providing practical insights for future research in machine consciousness and consciousness studies more broadly.

Comments

No comments yet.

Log in to comment