Confidence in consciousness research.
Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science October 7, 2022 DOI: 10.1002/wcs.1628 via Semantic Scholar
Summary
AI-generated from the abstractConfidence-based procedures, which use metacognitive indicators to determine whether subjects consciously perceive stimuli, are valid and accurate enough for practical and scientific purposes in consciousness research. This article reviews common objections to these procedures and concludes they are appropriate for assessing conscious perception.
Study at a glance
| Characteristics | Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Keywords | Medicine Psychology |
| Key finding | Confidence-based procedures are valid for assessing consciousness and, in most cases, accurate enough for practical and scientific purposes. |
Abstract
To study (un)conscious perception and test hypotheses about consciousness, researchers need procedures for determining whether subjects consciously perceive stimuli or not. This article is an introduction to a family of procedures called "confidence-based procedures," which consist in interpreting metacognitive indicators as indicators of consciousness. I assess the validity and accuracy of these procedures, and answer a series of common objections to their use in consciousness research. I conclude that confidence-based procedures are valid for assessing consciousness, and, in most cases, accurate enough for our practical and scientific purposes. This article is categorized under: Psychology > Perception and Psychophysics Philosophy > Consciousness.