Empirical explorations of mindfulness: Conceptual and methodological conundrums.
Emotion February 1, 2010 DOI: 10.1037/a0018480 via OpenAlex
Summary
AI-generated from the abstractMindfulness practice primarily targets emotion, with transformation in trait affect being a key goal across contemplative traditions. The term "mindfulness" is used in multiple ways—referring to states, traits, and experimentally manipulated variables—so it is essential to specify how it is operationalized in each context. Methodological issues include the duration of training and how it should be measured, as well as the nature of control and comparison groups in studies of mindfulness-based interventions. The commentary also considers which targets within emotion processing are likely to be impacted by mindfulness, highlighting substantial progress in the empirical study of the field.
Study at a glance
| Characteristics | Commentary Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Topics | Meditation |
| Keywords | Operationalization Context archaeology Empirical research Psychological intervention |
| Citations | 370 |
| Key finding | Mindfulness practice primarily targets emotion, and transformation in trait affect is a key goal of contemplative traditions. |
Abstract
This commentary reflects on the articles in this Special Issue. The appearance of this group of articles underscores the important idea that a major target of mindfulness practice is on emotion. Transformation in trait affect is a key goal of all contemplative traditions. This commentary addresses several key methodological and conceptual issues in the empirical study of mindfulness. The many ways in which the term "mindfulness" is used in the articles in this Special Issue are noted, and they include its reference to states, traits, and independent variables that are manipulated in an experimental context. How the term "mindfulness" is conceptualized and operationalized is crucial, and for progress to be made it is essential that we qualify the use of this term by reference to how it is being operationalized in each context. Other methodological issues are considered, such as the duration of training and how it should be measured, and the nature of control and comparison groups in studies of mindfulness-based interventions. Finally, the commentary ends with a consideration of the targets within emotion processing that are likely to be impacted by mindfulness. This collection of articles underscores the substantial progress that has occurred in the empirical study of mindfulness and it is a harbinger of a very promising future in this area.