Skip to content

Neural Correlates of Conscious Motion Perception.

Gonzalo Boncompte, Diego Cosmelli

Frontiers in human neuroscience January 1, 2018 DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2018.00355 via PubMed

Summary

AI-generated from the abstract

The neural signature of conscious perception is debated, with candidates including the P3b, Visual Awareness Negativity (VAN), and early components like P1. Most studies use static images, favoring ventral stream processing. This experiment isolated local motion, a dorsally processed feature, as the consciously perceived content. Using physical equality between Seen and Unseen conditions and minimal contrast differences, a P3b with wide centro-parietal distribution strongly correlated with stimulus detection, with larger magnitude for Seen vs. Unseen conditions consistently at the single subject level. VAN was undetectable, and P1 was absent. A N2pc component appeared in the 200-300 ms window, consistent with high attentional demands. Results extend P3b's role as a content-independent neural correlate of consciousness to visual motion perception.

Study at a glance

Characteristics Experimental study Peer reviewed
Keywords P3b Conscious perception Consciousness Motion perception Perceptual feature
Key finding P3b strongly correlated with conscious detection of local motion, while VAN was undetectable and P1 was absent, extending P3b's role as a content-independent neural correlate of consciousness to dorsally processed motion.

Abstract

The nature of the proper neural signature of conscious perception remains a topic of active debate. Theoretical support from integrative theories of consciousness is consistent with such signature being P3b, one of the main candidates in the literature. Recent work has also put forward a mid-latency and more localized component, the Visual Awareness Negativity (VAN), as a proper Neural Correlate of Consciousness (NCC). Early local components like P1 have also been proposed. However, experiments exploring visual NCCs are conducted almost exclusively using static images as the content to be consciously perceived, favoring ventral stream processing, therefore limiting the scope of the NCCs that have been identified. Here we explored the visual NCCs isolating local motion, a dorsally processed feature, as the primary feature being consciously perceived. Physical equality between Seen and Unseen conditions in addition to a minimal contrast difference between target and no-target displays was employed. In agreement with previous literature, we found a P3b with a wide centro-parietal distribution that strongly correlated with the detection of the stimuli. P3b magnitude was larger for Seen vs. Unseen conditions, a result that was consistently observed at the single subject level. In contrast, we were unable to detect VAN in our data, regardless of whether the subject perceived or not the stimuli. In the 200-300 ms time window we found a N2pc component, consistent with the high attentional demands of our task. Early components like P1 were not observed in our data, in agreement with their proposed role in the processing of visual features, but not as proper NCCs. Our results extend the role of P3b as a content independent NCC to conscious visual motion perception.

Comments

No comments yet.

Log in to comment