Skip to content

From Flow States to Visionary Experiences: The Ethical Challenges of Understanding and Managing Emergent Phenomena in Healthcare

Olivier Sandilands, Julieta Galante, Brian Spittles, Daniel MacLellan Ingram

April 26, 2026 preprint DOI: 10.31234/osf.io/g2ev7_v1 via OpenAlex

Summary

AI-generated from the abstract

Emergent phenomena, experiences, and effects (EPEEs)—including flow states, energetic phenomena, and visionary experiences—arise from diverse causes such as meditation, psychedelics, stress, or major life changes. While some EPEEs are therapeutic and linked to positive development and flourishing, others cause distress and can overlap with psychiatric symptoms. Despite their prevalence, EPEEs are underrecognized in clinical settings, leaving many without adequate support. This paper argues that the lack of clinical awareness and research into EPEEs violates ethical principles of beneficence, non-maleficence, autonomy, and justice, limiting informed consent and equitable care. It calls for a dedicated research agenda to address the risks and benefits of EPEEs.

Study at a glance

Characteristics Theoretical or philosophical paper
Topics Meditation
Keywords Popularity Limiting Health care Informed consent
Key finding The lack of clinical awareness and research into emergent phenomena, experiences, and effects (EPEEs) violates ethical standards, limiting informed consent and equitable care.

Abstract

Emergent phenomena, experiences, and effects (EPEEs)—such as flow states, energetic phenomena, and visionary experiences—occur widely through diverse causes and across various contexts. These include practices that are gaining popularity in clinical settings and beyond like meditation and psychedelics, but also triggers like stress or major life changes. While some EPEEs are therapeutic, associated with positive developmental trajectories and deep flourishing, others can cause distress, sometimes overlapping with psychiatric symptoms. Despite their prevalence, EPEEs are underrecognized in clinical settings, leaving many without adequate support. This paper explores the ethical implications of this knowledge gap using the principles of beneficence, non-maleficence, autonomy, and justice. We argue that the lack of clinical awareness and research into EPEEs violates ethical standards, limiting informed consent and equitable care. The paper calls for a dedicated research agenda to better understand and address the risks and benefits of EPEEs, ensuring ethically sound clinical practice.

Explore topics

Comments

No comments yet.

Log in to comment