AlphaFold2 structures guide prospective ligand discovery
Jiankun Lyu, Nicholas J. Kapolka, Ryan H. Gumpper, Assaf Alon, Liang Wang, Manish K. Jain, Ximena Barros-Álvarez, Kensuke Sakamoto, Yoojoong Kim, Jeffrey F. Diberto, Kuglae Kim, Isabella Glenn, Tia A. Tummino, Sijie Huang, John J. Irwin, Olga O. Tarkhanova, Yurii S. Moroz, Georgios Skiniotis, Andrew C. Kruse, Brian K. Shoichet, Bryan L. Roth
Science May 16, 2024 DOI: 10.1126/science.adn6354 via OpenAlex
Summary
AI-generated from the abstractDocking large libraries of molecules against unrefined AlphaFold2 (AF2) models of the σ2 and serotonin 2A (5-HT2A) receptors produced hit rates and affinities as high as those obtained by docking against experimental structures. These results were achieved despite differences in orthosteric residue conformations between the AF2 models and the experimental structures. A cryo–electron microscopy structure of one potent 5-HT2A ligand identified from AF2 docking showed residue accommodations similar to the AF2 prediction. AF2 models may sample low-energy conformations that differ from experimental structures but remain useful for ligand discovery, extending the reach of structure-based drug design.
Study at a glance
| Characteristics | Prospective docking study Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Keywords | Docking animal Computational biology Affinities Stereochemistry Ligand biochemistry |
| Citations | 145 |
| Key finding | Docking against unrefined AlphaFold2 models of the σ2 and 5-HT2A receptors yielded hit rates and affinities comparable to those from docking against experimental structures. |
Abstract
AlphaFold2 (AF2) models have had wide impact but mixed success in retrospective ligand recognition. We prospectively docked large libraries against unrefined AF2 models of the σ 2 and serotonin 2A (5-HT2A) receptors, testing hundreds of new molecules and comparing results with those obtained from docking against the experimental structures. Hit rates were high and similar for the experimental and AF2 structures, as were affinities. Success in docking against the AF2 models was achieved despite differences between orthosteric residue conformations in the AF2 models and the experimental structures. Determination of the cryo–electron microscopy structure for one of the more potent 5-HT2A ligands from the AF2 docking revealed residue accommodations that resembled the AF2 prediction. AF2 models may sample conformations that differ from experimental structures but remain low energy and relevant for ligand discovery, extending the domain of structure-based drug design.