Skip to content

Geddes A. Think Twice, It’s All Right: Animalism, Disunity and the Self / trans. from Engl. V. A. Sermaksheva

V. A. Sermaksheva

Омский научный вестник: Серия "Общество. История. Современность" November 26, 2021 DOI: 10.25206/2542-0488-2021-6-4-124-129 via DOAJ

Summary

AI-generated from the abstract

Animalism holds that each person is numerically identical to a human animal. Critics argue that disunity cases, where a human animal lacks mental unity, challenge this view. Tim Bayne recently argued against animalism using Cerberus, a single animal with two heads, each having its own stream of consciousness. This paper shows that Bayne's arguments are flawed and that animalism can handle the Cerberus case.

Study at a glance

Characteristics Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed
Keywords Animalism I-thoughts The first-person perspective Personal identity
Key finding Bayne's arguments against animalism based on the Cerberus case are flawed, and animalism can handle the case.

Abstract

According to animalism, each of us is numerically identical to a human animal. Disunity cases – cases in which a human animal lacks some form of mental unity – are often thought to pose a problem for animalism. Tim Bayne has recently offered some novel arguments against animalism based on one particular disunity case, namely Cerberus: a single animal with two heads, each housing its own stream of consciousness. I show that Bayne’s arguments are flawed, and that animalism is capable of handling the case.

Comments

No comments yet.

Log in to comment