Interaction of Philosophical Anthropology and Neurosciences in the Context of Natural and Artificial Intelligence
Философская мысль July 1, 2023 DOI: 10.25136/2409-8728.2023.7.39854 via Semantic Scholar
Summary
AI-generated from the abstractPhilosophical anthropology and neuroscience can together illuminate fundamental questions about consciousness, intelligence, and the ethical implications of artificial intelligence. The article proposes an interdisciplinary approach that combines dialectical, hermeneutic, and phenomenological methods from philosophy with empirical findings from neuroscience. This dialogue allows philosophical anthropology to provide a conceptual framework for understanding human experience while neuroscience offers empirical evidence to test and refine philosophical theories. The interplay between these fields can yield insights into consciousness, the self, and free will, though problems remain in bridging philosophical and empirical perspectives.
Study at a glance
| Characteristics | Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Keywords | Philosophy Computer science |
| Key finding | An interdisciplinary dialogue between philosophical anthropology and neuroscience can provide valuable insights into consciousness, the self, free will, and the ethical implications of artificial intelligence. |
Abstract
The subject of the study is the relationship between philosophical anthropologists, who deal with the nature and essence of man, and neurosciences, who study neural processes - the work of the brain and nervous system. In particular, the present article is a discovery of how these two fields can shed light on issues related to detection and artificial intelligence, such as the nature of consciousness and intelligence, as well as the possibility of creating conscious machines and the ethical implications of the emergence of artificial intelligence. The study suggests an interdisciplinary approach. In this methodological work, dialectical methods are encountered in this important methodological plane, but also the hermeneutic and phenomenological approaches most often used in philosophical research are used. The novelty of research is found in the frequency of violations between the philosophical and empirical points of medicine in the considered area. Within the framework of this study, a philosophical examination is carried out for the most “objective” examination - a representative of philosophical anthropology, the doctrine of the nature and nature of man. The subject of research suggesting the creation of a promising possession towards a versatile understanding of man. Problems notwithstanding, the interplay between philosophical anthropology and neuroscience can provide valuable insights into some of the most fundamental and elusive aspects of the human experience, such as consciousness, the self, and free will. The interaction of philosophical anthropology and neuroscience can be organized as a dialogue between two approaches to understanding the human condition. Philosophical anthropology offers a conceptual framework for thinking about the nature of human experience, while neuroscience provides empirical evidence that can help test and refine philosophical theories. Together, these two areas can help shed light on some of man's most fundamental questions about what it means to be.