Skip to content

The Neural Correlates of Religious and Nonreligious Belief

Sam Harris, Jonas Kaplan, Ashley Curiel, Susan Y. Bookheimer, Marco Iacoboni, Mark S. Cohen

PLoS ONE September 30, 2009 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0007272 via OpenAlex

Summary

Religious and nonreligious thinking activate different broad brain regions, but the neural difference between believing and disbelieving a statement is the same regardless of whether the content is religious or ordinary. This suggests that the brain's acceptance of statements as true or false operates through a content-independent mechanism, which may help explain how people come to accept any kind of statement as a valid description of the world.

Study at a glance

Characteristics Observational study Peer reviewed
Keywords Medicine Psychology
Citations 173
Key finding The neural difference between belief and disbelief is content-independent, applying equally to religious and nonreligious statements.

Abstract

While religious and nonreligious thinking differentially engage broad regions of the frontal, parietal, and medial temporal lobes, the difference between belief and disbelief appears to be content-independent. Our study compares religious thinking with ordinary cognition and, as such, constitutes a step toward developing a neuropsychology of religion. However, these findings may also further our understanding of how the brain accepts statements of all kinds to be valid descriptions of the world.

Comments

No comments yet.

Log in to comment