The Neural Correlates of Religious and Nonreligious Belief
Sam Harris, Jonas Kaplan, Ashley Curiel, Susan Y. Bookheimer, Marco Iacoboni, Mark S. Cohen
PLoS ONE September 30, 2009 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0007272 via OpenAlex
Summary
Religious and nonreligious thinking activate different broad brain regions, but the neural difference between believing and disbelieving a statement is the same regardless of whether the content is religious or ordinary. This suggests that the brain's acceptance of statements as true or false operates through a content-independent mechanism, which may help explain how people come to accept any kind of statement as a valid description of the world.
Study at a glance
| Characteristics | Observational study Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Keywords | Medicine Psychology |
| Citations | 173 |
| Key finding | The neural difference between belief and disbelief is content-independent, applying equally to religious and nonreligious statements. |
Abstract
While religious and nonreligious thinking differentially engage broad regions of the frontal, parietal, and medial temporal lobes, the difference between belief and disbelief appears to be content-independent. Our study compares religious thinking with ordinary cognition and, as such, constitutes a step toward developing a neuropsychology of religion. However, these findings may also further our understanding of how the brain accepts statements of all kinds to be valid descriptions of the world.