Using contemplative nature engagement practices to address ecological distress
Rose Macaulay, Cullan Joyce, Katherine A. Johnson, Dianne Vella‐brodrick, Iain Walker, Kathryn Williams
People and Nature October 7, 2025 Peer reviewed DOI: 10.1002/pan3.70172 via OpenAlex
Summary
Interventions combining nature-based activities with contemplative practices can help people cope with eco-distress. Interviews and workshops with teachers and leaders identified four pathways to adaptive change: restoration and reduced stress through presence; facing and working with difficult emotions; shifting and expanding self-boundaries; and strengthening values and commitments to action. These pathways form a layered, reciprocal set of mechanisms that reinforce each other over time. Workshop data also yielded design recommendations for implementing such practices.
Study at a glance
| Design | qualitative study |
|---|---|
| Population | teachers and leaders of contemplative nature engagement practices |
| Key finding | Four key pathways link contemplative nature engagement practices to adaptive outcomes for eco-distress: restoration through presence, working with difficult emotions, shifting self-boundaries, and strengthening values and commitments. |
Abstract
Abstract Worsening impacts of climate and ecological change have led to a rise in eco‐distress and related psychological impacts of these crises. Interventions, including both nature‐based activities and contemplative practices, have been developed to help individuals experiencing eco‐distress. However, the integration of contemplation and nature engagement remains unexplored. In this study we explore how these two practices support adaptive outcomes concerning eco‐distress. We conducted 11 semi‐structured interviews and two workshops with teachers and leaders of contemplative nature engagement practices, to understand the practices and pathways linking practices to outcomes related to eco‐distress. Thematic analysis of interview data identified four key pathways to adaptive change: (1) restoration and reduced stress through presence; (2) facing and working with difficult emotions; (3) shifting and expanding self‐boundaries; and (4) strengthening values and commitments to action. These insights build on theoretical work in both contemplative studies and environmental psychology literature by proposing a layered and reciprocal set of mechanisms that build on and reinforce each other over time. Analysis of workshop data identified intervention design recommendations to inform the practical design and implementation of contemplative nature engagement practices for individuals experiencing eco‐distress. Read the free Plain Language Summary for this article on the Journal blog.