Phenomenological Research Needs to be Renewed: Time to Integrate Enactivism as a Flexible Resource
International Journal of Qualitative Methods January 1, 2021 Peer reviewed DOI: 10.1177/1609406921995299 via Semantic Scholar
Summary
Phenomenological qualitative research has become overly prescriptive and dogmatic. This process paper argues for renewal through the post-cognitivist paradigm of enactivism, which draws on phenomenology and embodied cognition. Enactivism offers flexible resources for exploring the unfolding of subjective experience and sense-making, understood as a 5E process (Embodied, Embedded, Enacted, Emotive, and Extended). The authors suggest combining enactivism with existing methods like observation, interviews, and thematic analysis with hybrid coding. They illustrate this with an enactive study of clinician-patient co-construction of pain-related meanings, and provide a sample interview guide, codebook, and rigor criteria.
Study at a glance
| Design | process paper |
|---|---|
| Key finding | Enactivism can inform phenomenological research in eclectic, non-prescriptive ways, moving beyond methodological individualism to explore the complex, dynamic, and context-sensitive nature of sense-making. |
Abstract
Qualitative research approaches under the umbrella of phenomenology are becoming overly prescriptive and dogmatic (e.g., excessive and unnecessary focus on the epoché and reduction). There is a need for phenomenology (as a qualitative research approach) to be renewed and refreshed with opportunities for methodological flexibility. In this process paper, we offer one way this could be achieved. We provide an overview of the emerging paradigm of post-cognitivism and the aligned movement of enactivism which has roots in phenomenology and embodied cognition. We argue that enactivism can be used as a flexible resource by qualitative researchers exploring the unfolding of first-person (subjective) experience and its meanings (i.e., the enactive concept of sense-making). Enactive approaches are commonly tethered to “E-based” theory, such as the idea that sense-making is a 5E process (Embodied, Embedded, Enacted, Emotive, and Extended). We suggest that enactivism and E-based theory can inform phenomenological research in eclectic and non-prescriptive ways, including integration with existing methods such as observation/interviews and thematic analysis with hybrid deductive-inductive coding. Enactivism-informed phenomenological research moves beyond methodological individualism and can inform novel qualitative research exploring the complex, dynamic, and context-sensitive nature of sense-making. We draw from our enactive study that explored the co-construction of pain-related meanings between clinicians and patients, while also offering other ways that enactive theory could be applied. We provide a sample interview guide and codebook, as well as key components of rigor to consider when designing, conducting, and reporting a trustworthy phenomenological study using enactive theory.