Source-level Cortical Power Changes for Xenon and Nitrous Oxide–induced Reductions in Consciousness in Healthy Male Volunteers
Andria Pelentritou, Levin Kuhlmann, John Cormack, Steven McGuigan, Will Woods, Suresh Muthukumaraswamy, David T. J. Liley
Anesthesiology February 6, 2020 DOI: 10.1097/aln.0000000000003169 via OpenAlex
Summary
Xenon and nitrous oxide produce different patterns of brain oscillatory power changes, depending on the gas and the recording method. Xenon increased low-frequency delta and theta power only at loss of responsiveness (delta: 208.3%, theta: 107.4% in MEG; delta: 260.3%, theta: 116.3% in EEG). Nitrous oxide increased high-frequency gamma power (low gamma: 46.3%, high gamma: 45.7% in MEG) and reduced frontal alpha power at 0.75 MACawake in MEG (44.4% reduction) and at 0.50 MACawake in EEG (44.0% reduction). The findings show no clear universal features of action for these two gaseous anesthetics, and differences between MEG and EEG must be considered for accurate brain state monitoring during anesthesia.
Study at a glance
| Characteristics | Crossover design Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Sample size | 21 |
| Population | Healthy males |
| Interventions | Nitrous oxide Xenon |
| Dose | 0.25, 0.50, and 0.75 equivalent minimum alveolar concentration-awake (MACawake) for both gases; 1.30 MACawake xenon for loss of responsiveness |
| Keywords | Nitrous oxide Xenon Anesthesia Anesthetic Medicine |
| Citations | 15 |
| Key finding | Xenon and nitrous oxide produce distinct, modality-dependent patterns of oscillatory power changes, with no universal features of action shared between the two gases. |
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Investigations of the electrophysiology of gaseous anesthetics xenon and nitrous oxide are limited revealing inconsistent frequency-dependent alterations in spectral power and functional connectivity. Here, the authors describe the effects of sedative, equivalent, stepwise levels of xenon and nitrous oxide administration on oscillatory source power using a crossover design to investigate shared and disparate mechanisms of gaseous xenon and nitrous oxide anesthesia. METHODS: Twenty-one healthy males underwent simultaneous magnetoencephalography and electroencephalography recordings. In separate sessions, sedative, equivalent subanesthetic doses of gaseous anesthetic agents nitrous oxide and xenon (0.25, 0.50, and 0.75 equivalent minimum alveolar concentration-awake [MACawake]) and 1.30 MACawake xenon (for loss of responsiveness) were administered. Source power in various frequency bands were computed and statistically assessed relative to a conscious/pre-gas baseline. RESULTS: Observed changes in spectral-band power (P < 0.005) were found to depend not only on the gas delivered, but also on the recording modality. While xenon was found to increase low-frequency band power only at loss of responsiveness in both source-reconstructed magnetoencephalographic (delta, 208.3%, 95% CI [135.7, 281.0%]; theta, 107.4%, 95% CI [63.5, 151.4%]) and electroencephalographic recordings (delta, 260.3%, 95% CI [225.7, 294.9%]; theta, 116.3%, 95% CI [72.6, 160.0%]), nitrous oxide only produced significant magnetoencephalographic high-frequency band increases (low gamma, 46.3%, 95% CI [34.6, 57.9%]; high gamma, 45.7%, 95% CI [34.5, 56.8%]). Nitrous oxide-not xenon-produced consistent topologic (frontal) magnetoencephalographic reductions in alpha power at 0.75 MACawake doses (44.4%; 95% CI [-50.1, -38.6%]), whereas electroencephalographically nitrous oxide produced maximal reductions in alpha power at submaximal levels (0.50 MACawake, -44.0%; 95% CI [-48.1,-40.0%]). CONCLUSIONS: Electromagnetic source-level imaging revealed widespread power changes in xenon and nitrous oxide anesthesia, but failed to reveal clear universal features of action for these two gaseous anesthetics. Magnetoencephalographic and electroencephalographic power changes showed notable differences which will need to be taken into account to ensure the accurate monitoring of brain state during anaesthesia.