Skip to content

Valentyn Sobolenko

Department of Psychology, University of Toronto Mississauga, Mississauga, Canada.

3 papers in the library · 12 citations · publishing 2024-2026

Papers

Global Trends in Psychedelic Microdosing: Demographics, Substance Testing Behavior, and Patterns of Use

Journal of Psychoactive Drugs November 6, 2024 Rotem Petranker, Valentyn Sobolenko, Zeina Beidas et al. 9 citations

People who exclusively microdose psychedelics differ from those who also take larger doses. Exclusive microdosers are older (average 46.4 vs. 42.0 years), more often female (68.4% vs. 44.7%), non-Caucasian (25.4% vs. 14.7%), and urban residents (43.9% vs. 38.5%). They report using fewer non-psychedelic substances over their lifetime (3.8 vs. 4.7 substances). Most microdose multiple times a month (52.5%), commonly using psilocybin (74.5%), LSD (34.4%), or ketamine (15.8%), and 64.6% do not test their substances. The main reason for microdosing is improving general wellbeing (73.0%).

Preferences, Perceptions, and Environmental Considerations of Natural and Synthetic Psychedelic Substances: Findings from the Global Psychedelic Survey

Journal of Psychoactive Drugs December 24, 2024 Omer A Syed, Rotem Petranker, Emily C Fewster et al. 3 citations

A strong preference for natural over synthetic sources exists among users of psilocybin (75%), DMT (56%), and mescaline (56%), based on an anonymous online survey of 6,379 consumers from 85 countries. About half of respondents (50.8%) believe the source affects a psychedelic's psychological and physiological effects, while 34.4% are neutral. Despite preferring natural sources, 67.7% would switch to synthetic alternatives if it reduced environmental harm from overharvesting. The survey's respondents came mainly from anglophone regions.

Clinical Predictors of Antidepressant Effects of Ketamine and Esketamine in Treatment-Resistant Unipolar and Bipolar Depression: A Systematic Review

CNS Drugs July 1, 2026 Omer A. Syed, Valentyn Sobolenko, Sean M. Nestor et al.

Most demographic and clinical variables do not reliably predict who will benefit from ketamine or esketamine for treatment-resistant depression, though a few promising factors—such as early response to treatment and a family history of substance use disorders—warrant further study. This systematic review synthesized 122 studies involving 12,674 participants, finding that the majority of 77 examined predictor variables showed no association with antidepressant outcomes. The review included both unipolar and bipolar treatment-resistant depression, with most studies using intravenous ketamine at a fixed 0.5 mg/kg dose.