Skip to content

Melissa A. Rosenkranz

7 papers in the library · 3,281 citations · publishing 2003-2024

Papers

Alterations in Brain and Immune Function Produced by Mindfulness Meditation

Psychosomatic Medicine July 1, 2003 Richard J. Davidson, Jon Kabat‐zinn, Jessica R. Schumacher et al. 2,924 citations

An 8-week mindfulness meditation training program for healthy employees increased left-sided anterior brain activation, a pattern linked to positive emotion, and boosted antibody titers after an influenza vaccine compared with a wait-list control group. The magnitude of the brain activation increase predicted the size of the antibody response. These results indicate that a brief meditation intervention can measurably alter brain and immune function.

Does the Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire measure what we think it does? Construct validity evidence from an active controlled randomized clinical trial.

Psychological Assessment October 13, 2015 Simon B. Goldberg, Joseph Wielgosz, Cortland J. Dahl et al. 180 citations

A randomized trial with 130 participants tested whether the Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire (FFMQ) validly measures dispositional mindfulness. The study included three groups: mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR), an active control condition (Health Enhancement Program, HEP) that did not teach mindfulness meditation, and a waitlist control. At baseline, FFMQ facets correlated with measures of psychological symptoms and well-being, providing partial evidence for convergent validity. FFMQ scores increased for MBSR relative to the waitlist, but they also increased for HEP relative to the waitlist, and MBSR and HEP did not differ from each other. The FFMQ thus failed to show discriminant validity, raising questions about its ability to specifically measure mindfulness.

Individual participant data systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials assessing adult mindfulness-based programmes for mental health promotion in non-clinical settings.

Nature. Mental health July 10, 2023 Julieta Galante, Claire Friedrich, Napaporn Aeamla-Or et al. 102 citations

Mindfulness-based programmes reduce psychological distress (anxiety and depression) in community adults who volunteer to participate, with a small to moderate effect size. The analysis of 13 randomized controlled trials with 2,371 participants from 8 countries found a standardized mean difference of -0.32, with high confidence in the result. The effect was not clearly influenced by participants' baseline distress level, gender, age, education, or dispositional mindfulness. More research is needed to understand why outcomes vary between individuals.

Absence of structural brain changes from mindfulness-based stress reduction: Two combined randomized controlled trials

Science Advances May 20, 2022 Tammi R. A. Kral, Kaley Davis, Cole Korponay et al. 67 citations

A large, rigorously controlled study failed to find evidence that an 8-week mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR) course changes brain structure. Combining data from two randomized controlled trials with 218 meditation-naïve participants, the study compared MBSR to an active control and a waitlist group. Using structural MRI scans before and after the intervention, researchers assessed gray matter volume, gray matter density, and cortical thickness. No neuroplastic changes were observed in the MBSR group compared to either control group, either across the whole brain or in regions previously reported to change. This contradicts widely referenced earlier claims that MBSR alters brain structure.

Prevalence of harm in Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction

January 30, 2020 Matthew J. Hirshberg, Simon B. Goldberg, Melissa A. Rosenkranz et al. 5 citations preprint

Mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR) does not increase harm compared to no treatment, and may instead protect against harm. Analyzing data from over 2,000 community clinic participants and from three randomized controlled trials, the study found no evidence that MBSR leads to higher rates of worsened psychological or physical symptoms, anxiety, depression, interpersonal discomfort, paranoid ideation, or psychoticism. On many measures, community MBSR participants showed significantly lower rates of harm than controls. The findings suggest MBSR is not associated with increased harm, though a small proportion of participants do experience harm, warranting further research.

Non-replication of structural brain changes from Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction: Two combined randomized controlled trials

medRxiv June 16, 2021 Tammi R. A. Kral, Kaley Davis, Cole Korponay et al. 2 citations preprint

A large, rigorously controlled study combining data from two three-arm randomized controlled trials found no evidence that an eight-week Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction (MBSR) course produces changes in brain structure. Meditation-naive participants (218 total) were randomly assigned to a waitlist, an 8-week MBSR program, or a validated active control group. Structural MRI scans taken before and after the intervention showed no significant differences in gray matter volume, gray matter density, or cortical thickness between MBSR and either control group, at either the whole-brain level or in brain regions previously linked to MBSR. These results fail to replicate earlier, widely cited claims of MBSR-induced neuroplasticity.

Connectome predictive modeling of trait mindfulness

bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) July 14, 2024 Isaac N. Treves, Aaron Kucyi, Madelynn Park et al. 1 citation preprint

Trait mindfulness—the tendency to attend to present-moment experience non-judgmentally—is linked to better mental health, but its neural basis remains unclear. In the largest resting-state fMRI study of trait mindfulness to date, involving 367 adults across three samples, researchers used connectome predictive modeling to test whether brain connectivity patterns could predict mindfulness scores. No connections predicted overall trait mindfulness, but models for two subscales—Acting with Awareness and Non-judging—were identified. Positive networks for these subscales involved fronto-parietal and default-mode networks, respectively. Negative networks, which overlapped across subscales, included somatomotor, visual, and default-mode connections. Only negative networks generalized to predict subscale scores in some out-of-sample datasets, and predictions correlated negatively with a mind-wandering model. The incomplete generalization and model overlap highlight the challenge of identifying robust brain markers for mindfulness facets.