Skip to content

Paul Grossman

3 papers in the library · 2,153 citations · publishing 2011

Papers

Loving-kindness and compassion meditation: potential for psychological interventions.

Clin Psychol Rev July 26, 2011 Stefan G. Hofmann, Paul Grossman, Devon E. Hinton 945 citations

Loving-kindness and compassion meditation may serve as effective psychological interventions. These practices, rooted in Buddhist traditions, focus on cultivating positive emotions toward oneself and others. The review suggests that such meditation can enhance positive affect, reduce negative psychological symptoms, and improve social connectedness. The evidence indicates potential benefits for treating depression, anxiety, and post-traumatic stress disorder, though further research is needed to establish clinical efficacy.

Defining mindfulness by how poorly I think I pay attention during everyday awareness and other intractable problems for psychology's (re)invention of mindfulness: Comment on Brown et al. (2011).

Psychological Assessment January 1, 2011 Paul Grossman 668 citations

Self-report questionnaires that claim to measure mindfulness as a personality trait face serious, possibly intractable problems. These include a lack of external benchmarks to verify what the scales actually measure, poor content validity, and evidence that people's self-ratings do not match their actual behavior. Different mindfulness scales fail to agree with each other, and responses are biased by a person's experience with meditation. The scales may distort and trivialize the original Buddhist concept of mindful awareness, harming both research and the development of mindfulness-based interventions. A deeper understanding of mindfulness, grounded in direct, long-term meditative practice and Buddhist phenomenology, is needed before psychologists attempt to quantify it.

Mindfulness, by any other name…: trials and tribulations of sati in western psychology and science

Contemporary Buddhism May 1, 2011 Paul Grossman, Nicholas T. Van Dam 540 citations

The Buddhist concept of mindfulness, central to many Western psychological interventions, originates from a centuries-old systematic investigation of subjective experience. Current enthusiasm for mindfulness in Western science has led to many different definitions, measurements, and self-report questionnaires that treat it as a stable personality trait. This paper identifies persistent problems with these attempts and warns that they risk distorting, diluting, or reifying the original Buddhist ideas. To properly understand and measure mindfulness, psychologists and scientists may need to study Buddhist phenomenology more deeply and engage in long-term direct practice of insight meditation, a step that seems necessary before any valid characterization or quantification can occur.