Skip to content

Cambridge quarterly of healthcare ethics : CQ : the international journal of healthcare ethics committees

ISSN 1469-2147

5 papers in the library · 120 citations · publishing 2016-2025

Papers

The Value and Disvalue of Consciousness.

Cambridge quarterly of healthcare ethics : CQ : the international journal of healthcare ethics committees October 1, 2016 Walter Glannon 32 citations

Consciousness defines personhood and enables both pleasurable and painful experiences. This essay examines four neurological conditions—intraoperative awareness, prolonged disorders of consciousness, locked-in syndrome, and the effects of narcotics and sedation on terminally ill patients—to explore when consciousness benefits or harms patients. The ethical significance of consciousness depends on the content of one's experience and whether one can report that content to others. Phenomenal consciousness, the subjective feel of awareness, can be harmful when a patient expects unconsciousness or when it allows uncommunicated suffering. Technology enabling reliable communication could benefit neurologically compromised patients. The conditions raise the question of when consciousness is preferable to unconsciousness.

Ethical Issues Regarding Nonsubjective Psychedelics as Standard of Care.

Cambridge quarterly of healthcare ethics : CQ : the international journal of healthcare ethics committees October 1, 2022 David B Yaden, Brian D Earp, Roland R Griffiths 31 citations

Psychedelics partly achieve their therapeutic effects through the subjective experiences they produce and how individuals interpret those experiences. Because these subjective effects can be disturbing for people with certain mental illnesses, researchers are developing 'nonsubjective' psychedelics that cause similar biological changes without the characteristic subjective effects. The authors broadly support creating such substances for scientific and clinical reasons but argue they should be reserved only for cases where subjective effects are specifically contraindicated. Classic psychedelics that produce subjective experiences should remain the default standard of care, as withholding typically positive, meaningful, and therapeutic experiences from most patients raises ethical concerns.

Psychedelics, Meaningfulness, and the "Proper Scope" of Medicine: Continuing the Conversation.

Cambridge quarterly of healthcare ethics : CQ : the international journal of healthcare ethics committees June 27, 2023 Katherine Cheung, Kyle Patch, Brian D Earp et al. 27 citations

Psychedelics like psilocybin produce altered states of consciousness that change perception, cognition, and affect. They show promise as therapeutic agents combined with talk therapy for conditions such as major depression and substance use disorder. It remains unclear whether these acute subjective effects are necessary for therapeutic benefits. This uncertainty has sparked debate about whether psychedelics without subjective effects could still have therapeutic impact, or whether the subjective effects are essential for full therapeutic realization.

Is the Requirement for First-Person Experience of Psychedelic Drugs a Justified Component of a Psychedelic Therapist's Training?

Cambridge quarterly of healthcare ethics : CQ : the international journal of healthcare ethics committees March 2, 2023 Nathan Emmerich, Bryce Humphries 27 citations

Psychedelic drugs such as psilocybin, ayahuasca, ketamine, MDMA, and LSD show therapeutic potential for conditions like PTSD, depression, existential distress, and addiction. Unlike conventional psychoactive drugs, psychedelics are experiential therapies whose value lies in the subjective experiences they induce. Some argue that trainee psychedelic therapists should undergo firsthand psychedelic experience to fully understand these effects. The authors question this, finding the claimed epistemic benefits not uniquely compelling and the evidence for their contribution to training insufficient. They conclude that requiring trainees to take psychedelics is not ethically legitimate, though permitting voluntary experience may be acceptable given potential epistemic benefit cannot be ruled out.

What Does It Mean to Be Human Today?

Cambridge quarterly of healthcare ethics : CQ : the international journal of healthcare ethics committees April 1, 2025 Julia Alessandra Harzheim 3 citations

Human beings increasingly see themselves as products of data and algorithms, mirroring machines and reducing mind to brain processes. This book counters such self-reification by defending a humanism of embodiment: corporeality, vitality, and embodied freedom form the basis of self-determined existence, using technology as a means rather than submitting to it. It offers an embodied and enactive account of the person—neither pure mind nor brain but a living being in relation with others—applied to AI, transhumanism, virtual reality, neuroscience, psychiatry, and societal acceleration that fosters disembodiment.