Skip to content

Dynamics of mental imagery.

Ishan Singhal, Nisheeth Srivastava

Consciousness and cognition May 1, 2025 DOI: 10.1016/j.concog.2025.103865 via PubMed

Summary

AI-generated from the abstract

Mental imagery unfolds at distinct timescales, with imagined contents being sluggish but more stable than visual perception. A large cohort (N = 827) completed six tasks recreating aspects of their imagination, revealing that temporal features of imagination can be accounted for by two factors: temporal ability and stability of mental imagery. Both imagination and perception share a common constraint: maintaining identically sized temporal windows of conscious experience.

Study at a glance

Characteristics Observational cohort Peer reviewed
Sample size 827
Population Large cohort of participants
Topics Philosophy of mind
Keywords Mental imagery Temporal dynamics Time-consciousness
Citations 4
Key finding Temporal features of imagination unfold at distinct timescales, accounted for by two factors (temporal ability and stability), and imagined contents are sluggish but more stable than perception, with both sharing a common constraint of identically sized temporal windows of conscious experience.

Abstract

Phenomenology of mental imagery can reveal the structure of underlying mental representations, yet progress has been limited because of its private nature. Through a phenomenology-recreation task we elucidate the dynamics of mental imagery. Specifically, the temporal grain, speed of object manipulation, smoothness of contents unfolding, and temporal extent of stability of imagined contents. To gauge these properties, we asked a large cohort of participants (N = 827) to recreate these aspects of their imagination in six tasks. Results showed that temporal features of imagination unfold at distinct timescales, though a factor analysis showed that variance in these tasks could be accounted for via two factors; temporal ability and stability of mental imagery. Additionally, we contrast these regularities with those documented for visual perception, showing that imagined contents are sluggish but more stable than perception. However, both imagination and perception share a common constraint; maintaining identically sized temporal windows of conscious experience.

Explore topics

Comments

No comments yet.

Log in to comment