A Review on Research and Evaluation Methods for Investigating Self-Transcendence.
Alexandra Kitson, Alice Chirico, Andrea Gaggioli, Bernhard E Riecke
Frontiers in psychology January 1, 2020 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.547687 via PubMed
Summary
AI-generated from the abstractSelf-transcendence involves reduced self-saliency (ego disillusionment) and increased connection, and interest in the topic has grown over the past decade. Several measures with some psychometric validity and reliability exist, but no prior review has systematically described, contrasted, and evaluated the various methodological approaches—including questionnaires, neurological and physiological measures, and qualitative methods. This review fills that gap by describing existing measurement methods, assessing their strengths and weaknesses, and suggesting future research directions and recommendations for selecting appropriate methods based on research context.
Study at a glance
| Characteristics | Review Qualitative Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Topics | Meditation |
| Keywords | Emotional experiences Flow Neurophenomenolgy Peak experiences |
| Key finding | No prior review has systematically described, contrasted, and evaluated the different methodological approaches toward measuring self-transcendence, including questionnaires, neurological and physiological measures, and qualitative methods. |
Abstract
Self-transcendence has been characterized as a decrease in self-saliency (ego disillusionment) and increased connection, and has been growing in research interest in the past decade. Several measures have been developed and published with some degree of psychometric validity and reliability. However, to date, there has been no review systematically describing, contrasting, and evaluating the different methodological approaches toward measuring self-transcendence including questionnaires, neurological and physiological measures, and qualitative methods. To address this gap, we conducted a review to describe existing methods of measuring self-transcendence, evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of these methods, and discuss research avenues to advance assessment of self-transcendence, including recommendations for suitability of methods given research contexts.