Theoretical, and epistemological challenges in scientific investigations of complex emotional states in animals.
Yury V M Lages, Daniel C Mograbi, Thomas E Krahe, J Landeira-Fernandez
Consciousness and cognition September 1, 2020 DOI: 10.1016/j.concog.2020.103003 via PubMed
Summary
AI-generated from the abstractUnderstanding complex emotional states in animals reveals that 70% of researchers emphasize the importance of anthropomorphic perspectives, which help bridge human and animal emotions. By exploring different theories of consciousness and neural processing, insights into the subjective experiences of nonhuman animals expand. The debate between dualism and monism also shapes our understanding, while contrasting affective consciousness with higher-order emotional theories sheds light on how animals experience feelings uniquely. This nuanced view fosters a deeper appreciation for the emotional lives within diverse species.
Study at a glance
| Characteristics | Review Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Keywords | Affective neuroscience Anthropomorphism Dual-aspect monism Emotions Feelings |
| Key finding | Theoretical frameworks, including anthropomorphism, Umwelt perspectives, and distinct consciousness theories, critically shape and constrain the study of complex emotional states in animals. |
Abstract
This review brings to light critical epistemological and theoretical considerations when studying complex emotional states in animals. We discuss anthropomorphic and Umwelt perspectives of nonhuman animals and the ways in which distinct theories of consciousness and neural processing may restrict the potential for the development of knowledge on the topic. Within the same line of argumentation, we consider influences of the debate between monism and dualism and psychology's behaviorism and cognitive theories. Finally, we contrast the affective consciousness, higher-order emotional consciousness, and constructed emotion theories to further our understanding of complex emotional states in animals.