Skip to content

Spór o naturę świadomości

Karol Polcyn

Filozofia Publiczna i Edukacja Demokratyczna September 17, 2020 DOI: 10.14746/fped.2013.2.1.10 via DOAJ

Summary

AI-generated from the abstract

Consciousness cannot be fully explained by physical terms, but whether conscious states are identical to physical states remains unresolved. This paper surveys key arguments—such as the knowledge argument—that aim to show conscious states are not physical. The author contends that materialists lack a satisfactory response to these arguments, leaving the non-physical nature of consciousness as a plausible conclusion.

Study at a glance

Characteristics Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed
Keywords Consciousness Materialism Conceivability Possibility The knowledge argument
Key finding Materialists have no satisfactory response to arguments that conscious states are not physical states.

Abstract

Although phenomenal consciousness resists explanation in physical terms, it remains an open question whether or not consciousness is an intrinsically physical phenomenon since it remains an open question whether or not conscious states are identical with physical states. This question is one of the key issues of debate in contemporary philosophy of mind. Here I survey some of the key arguments designed to show that conscious states are not physical states. I argue that materialists have no satisfactory response to those arguments.

Comments

No comments yet.

Log in to comment