Spór o naturę świadomości
Filozofia Publiczna i Edukacja Demokratyczna September 17, 2020 DOI: 10.14746/fped.2013.2.1.10 via DOAJ
Summary
AI-generated from the abstractConsciousness cannot be fully explained by physical terms, but whether conscious states are identical to physical states remains unresolved. This paper surveys key arguments—such as the knowledge argument—that aim to show conscious states are not physical. The author contends that materialists lack a satisfactory response to these arguments, leaving the non-physical nature of consciousness as a plausible conclusion.
Study at a glance
| Characteristics | Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Keywords | Consciousness Materialism Conceivability Possibility The knowledge argument |
| Key finding | Materialists have no satisfactory response to arguments that conscious states are not physical states. |
Abstract
Although phenomenal consciousness resists explanation in physical terms, it remains an open question whether or not consciousness is an intrinsically physical phenomenon since it remains an open question whether or not conscious states are identical with physical states. This question is one of the key issues of debate in contemporary philosophy of mind. Here I survey some of the key arguments designed to show that conscious states are not physical states. I argue that materialists have no satisfactory response to those arguments.