Are we underestimating the richness of visual experience?

Some researchers claim that perceptual experience is impoverished—that people perceive and remember very little visual information. However, the evidence indicates that this view is mistaken and that visual phenomenology is actually immensely rich. To accurately assess perceptual content, experiments should go beyond simple binary forced-choice tasks and instead analyze broader reports of experience. Adopting such methods will reveal the genuine richness of experience and its underlying neural basis.

Study at a glance

Abstract

It has been argued that the bandwidth of perceptual experience is low-that the richness of experience is illusory and that the amount of visual information observers can perceive and remember is extremely limited. However, the evidence suggests that this postulated poverty of experiential content is illusory and that visual phenomenology is immensely rich. To properly estimate perceptual content, experimentalists must move beyond the limitations of binary alternative-forced choice procedures and analyze reports of experience more broadly. This will open our eyes to the true richness of experience and to its neuronal substrates.