Skip to content

Stephen M. Stahl

University of California, San Diego

2 papers in the library · 773 citations · publishing 2022-2023

Papers

Treatment‐resistant depression: definition, prevalence, detection, management, and investigational interventions

World Psychiatry September 15, 2023 Roger S. McIntyre, Mohammad Alsuwaidan, Bernhard T. Baune et al. 712 citations

At least 30% of people with depression meet the common definition of treatment-resistant depression (TRD): inadequate response to two or more antidepressants despite adequate trials and adherence. Many cases are actually pseudo-resistant due to insufficient treatment or non-adherence. No consensus definition with proven predictive utility for clinical decisions exists, leading to varied prevalence estimates and inconsistent care. Intravenous ketamine and intranasal esketamine are effective for TRD. Some second-generation antipsychotics (e.g., aripiprazole, quetiapine XR) help as adjuncts in partial responders, but only the olanzapine-fluoxetine combination has been studied in FDA-defined TRD. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation and electroconvulsive therapy are established effective interventions. Evidence for extending trials, switching, or combining antidepressants is mixed, and manual-based psychotherapies are not effective alone but help when added to antidepressants.

Psilocybin in neuropsychiatry: a review of its pharmacology, safety, and efficacy

CNS Spectrums July 11, 2022 Seetal Dodd, Trevor R. Norman, Harris A. Eyre et al. 61 citations

Psilocybin, a tryptamine alkaloid found in Psilocybe mushrooms, is metabolized into the active compound psilocin, which produces psychoactive effects primarily by partially activating the 5HT2A receptor. Psilocin also binds to other receptor subtypes, though these actions are not fully understood. Clinical trials have tested psilocybin at hallucinogenic doses for addictive disorders, anxiety, and depression. This review assesses psilocybin and psilocin as potential neuropsychiatric treatments, weighing therapeutic benefits against potential harms. The authors conclude that careful evaluation of the number needed to harm versus the number needed to treat will determine clinical viability, and they call for a responsible path forward in this field.