Skip to content

Siegfried Kasper

Department of Molecular Neurosciences, Center for Brain Research, Vienna, Austria.

9 papers in the library · 753 citations · publishing 2018-2026

Papers

Treatment‐resistant depression: definition, prevalence, detection, management, and investigational interventions

World Psychiatry September 15, 2023 Roger S. McIntyre, Mohammad Alsuwaidan, Bernhard T. Baune et al. 712 citations

At least 30% of people with depression meet the common definition of treatment-resistant depression (TRD): inadequate response to two or more antidepressants despite adequate trials and adherence. Many cases are actually pseudo-resistant due to insufficient treatment or non-adherence. No consensus definition with proven predictive utility for clinical decisions exists, leading to varied prevalence estimates and inconsistent care. Intravenous ketamine and intranasal esketamine are effective for TRD. Some second-generation antipsychotics (e.g., aripiprazole, quetiapine XR) help as adjuncts in partial responders, but only the olanzapine-fluoxetine combination has been studied in FDA-defined TRD. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation and electroconvulsive therapy are established effective interventions. Evidence for extending trials, switching, or combining antidepressants is mixed, and manual-based psychotherapies are not effective alone but help when added to antidepressants.

Overcoming the myths of esketamine administration: different and not difficult

Frontiers in Psychiatry November 23, 2023 Florian Buchmayer, Siegfried Kasper 19 citations

Intranasal esketamine, approved in 2019 and 2020 for treatment-resistant depression, helps more than half of non-responders after 2–4 failed antidepressant attempts. Guidelines recommend starting it as an add-on therapy in a medical setting for dose selection, monitoring, and managing adverse events. Long-term treatment is safe, with very rare severe side effects. This review critically evaluates published articles on preparation, management, and observation of the treatment, noting that psychiatrists face new but manageable procedures compared to standard prescribing.

Parcellation of the Human Cerebral Cortex Based on Molecular Targets in the Serotonin System Quantified by Positron Emission Tomography In vivo

Cerebral Cortex September 6, 2018 Gregory M. James, Gregor Gryglewski, Thomas Vanicek et al. 16 citations

The cerebral cortex can be divided into distinct areas based on the density of proteins involved in the serotonin system. Using positron emission tomography in healthy participants, the study quantified serotonin 1A receptors (n = 30), 5-HT2A receptors (n = 22), the serotonin-degrading enzyme monoamine oxidase A (n = 32), and the serotonin transporter (n = 24). Clustering analysis identified five optimal clusters of cortical regions defined by these molecular profiles. These clusters explained the effects of psychotropic drugs acting on serotonin, such as antidepressants and psychedelics, suggesting the method is useful for integrating multimodal imaging data in neuropharmacology and psychiatry.

Perspectives in treatment-resistant depression: esketamine and electroconvulsive therapy.

Wiener klinische Wochenschrift March 1, 2025 Pia Baldinger-Melich, Marie Spies, Ina Bozic et al. 5 citations

Modern electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) and nasal esketamine have significantly improved treatment for treatment-resistant depression (TRD), defined as non-response to at least two adequate antidepressant courses. This literature review presents evidence on efficacy and safety, comparing advantages, disadvantages, and response rates. Both treatments are highly effective for TRD. The choice between esketamine nasal spray and ECT should consider contraindications, age, severity, psychotic symptoms, patient preference, and accessibility. Pragmatically, esketamine is chosen before ECT when both are indicated, but studies on ECT in ketamine non-responders are missing.

Oral Ketamine for the Treatment of Depression: A randomized controlled trial and meta-analysis

medRxiv Preprint Server March 21, 2025 Leo R. Silberbauer, Benjamin Eggerstorfer, Paul Michenthaler et al. 1 citation preprint

Oral ketamine may offer a more accessible alternative to intravenous and intranasal routes for treating depression, as it is easier to administer and has established safety and efficacy for chronic pain patients at home. The text suggests that current delivery methods limit ketamine's availability to specialized centers, but oral administration could expand access to antidepressant therapy.

Pharmacological augmentation in treatment-resistant depression: a neurobiologically informed, practical decision guide for treatment choice with lithium, quetiapine, or esketamine.

International journal of psychiatry in clinical practice April 29, 2026 David Eckert, Siegfried Kasper

A narrative review presents a decision-making framework for three pharmacological augmentation strategies for treatment-resistant depression: lithium, quetiapine, and esketamine. The agents differ in pharmacological profile, monitoring requirements, and clinical application, though their mechanisms appear to converge on neuroplasticity pathways. Treatment selection may be guided by psychiatric presentation, somatic comorbidity, and practical feasibility. Validated predictive markers for differential response are currently lacking.

Beyond first-line antidepressants: lithium, quetiapine, or esketamine? Integrating meta-analyses and preliminary head-to-head evidence

Figshare January 23, 2026 David Eckert, Siegfried Kasper

Treatment-resistant depression is a major clinical challenge, and guidelines recommend different pharmacological augmentations. A systematic review of head-to-head studies comparing lithium, quetiapine, and esketamine found only four trials: three comparing lithium and quetiapine, and one comparing esketamine and quetiapine. All three agents are effective, with a descriptive superiority of esketamine over quetiapine and of quetiapine over lithium. The results argue for re-evaluating treatment algorithms, but because the drugs differ in side effects, contraindications, and pharmacological profiles, embedding them in a comprehensive clinical context is important.

Beyond first-line antidepressants: lithium, quetiapine, or esketamine? Integrating meta-analyses and preliminary head-to-head evidence.

The world journal of biological psychiatry : the official journal of the World Federation of Societies of Biological Psychiatry January 22, 2026 David Eckert, Siegfried Kasper

For treatment-resistant depression, lithium, quetiapine, and esketamine are all effective augmentation options. A systematic review of head-to-head studies found only four trials: three comparing lithium and quetiapine, and one comparing esketamine and quetiapine. The evidence suggests a descriptive superiority of esketamine over quetiapine and of quetiapine over lithium. However, because the three drugs have fundamentally different properties, side effects, and contraindications, the choice should be made in a comprehensive clinical context. The findings argue for re-evaluating existing treatment algorithms in guidelines.