Skip to content

Evan Thompson

University of British Columbia, Department of Philosophy, 1866 Main Mall E370, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Y1, Canada.

9 papers in the library · 131 citations · publishing 2003-2026

Papers

The Kantian brain: brain dynamics from a neurophenomenological perspective.

Current opinion in neurobiology April 1, 2015 Sina Fazelpour, Evan Thompson 64 citations

Recent research on spontaneous brain rhythms and neural network coordination supports Immanuel Kant's concept of cognitive spontaneity—the mind's ability to organize sensory input in new ways. However, linking brain activity to cognition precisely remains difficult. Neurophenomenology, which incorporates subjective experience to explain variations in brain dynamics, provides a promising approach to this problem.

Neurophenomenology and the Spontaneity of Consciousness

Canadian Journal of Philosophy Supplementary Volume January 1, 2003 Robert Hanna, Evan Thompson 48 citations

Consciousness makes the mind-body problem especially difficult to solve. Our failure to understand the relationship between mind and body suggests that current concepts are inadequate and require development. Mind can be understood as a spatiotemporal pattern that shapes the brain's metastable dynamic patterns.

Dreamless Sleep, the Embodied Mind, and Consciousness The Relevance of a Classical Indian Debate to Cognitive Science

January 1, 2015 Evan Thompson, J. Windt 17 citations

A debate in classical Indian philosophy between Advaita Vedānta and Yoga, which held that consciousness is present in dreamless sleep, and the Nyāya school, which held it is absent, challenges the standard neuroscientific definition of consciousness as that which disappears in dreamless sleep and reappears upon waking or dreaming. The reasoning used by Advaita Vedānta to rebut the Nyāya view offers new resources for contemporary philosophy of mind. Findings from cognitive neuroscience have implications for Indian debates about cognition during sleep and for discussions of the self and its relationship to the body. The Indian materials suggest a need for a more refined taxonomy of sleep states than sleep science currently employs, and that contemplative mind training is relevant for advancing the neurophenomenology of sleep and consciousness.

Hypnosis and Meditation: A Neurophenomenological Comparison

November 6, 2017 Jelena Markovic, Evan Thompson 1 citation

A necessary first step in collaboration between hypnosis research and meditation research is clarification of key concepts. The authors propose that such clarification is best advanced by neurophenomenological investigations integrating neuroscience methods with phenomenological models based on first-person reports. Focusing on absorption, they argue that previous treatments of hypnosis and meditation as equivalent are incorrect, but they can be fruitfully compared when characteristic features of the states are examined. Using the phenomenological and neurocognitive matrix of mindfulness (PNM), they compare focused attention meditation and open monitoring meditation with hypnosis across its dimensions, interpreting empirical research on hypnosis and shedding light on debates about meta-awareness in hypnosis and the role of suggestion in meditation.

Enaction: Embodied Cognition

The Embodied Mind January 13, 2017 Francisco J. Varela, Evan Thompson, Eleanor Rosch 1 citation

Cognition depends on having a body with sensorimotor capacities, which are embedded in broader biological, psychological, and cultural contexts. Sensory and motor processes are fundamentally inseparable in lived cognition and have evolved together. The enactive approach holds that perception consists of perceptually guided action and that cognitive structures emerge from recurrent sensorimotor patterns enabling such guidance.

Response to commentators on the blind spot: why science cannot ignore human experience

Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences March 23, 2026 Evan Thompson

The author replies to commentaries on the book The Blind Spot, which argues that science must account for human experience rather than pretend to an objective view from nowhere. The response engages with points raised by Chirimuuta, Froese, Kyselo, and Vanney, defending the book's critique of reductionism and its call for a science that incorporates first-person experience and sense-making. The author maintains that ignoring the subjective, embodied dimension of knowing creates a blind spot that undermines scientific understanding.

Phenomenology of the stream of thought: dissociable dynamic dimensions revealed through experience sampling.

Neuroscience of consciousness January 1, 2026 Sneha K S Sheth, Mike Doswell, Kalina Christoff Hadjiilieva et al.

Over the past 25 years, neuroscience has focused on perceptual consciousness, but the dynamic experience of the stream of thought—first described by William James—has received less attention. The Dynamic Framework of Thought (DFT) provides a taxonomy of thought dynamics. This study used four experiments, including laboratory, online, and fMRI-based settings, to test whether people can introspectively access and distinguish two thought dimensions: freely moving and deliberately directed. In all experiments, participants reported their thought dynamics during a probed resting period with eyes open. Using mixed methods, the findings suggest that individuals have some introspective access to these dynamics.

Commentary on Dan Arnold, Brains, Buddhas, and Believing: The Problem of Intentionality in Classical Buddhist and Cognitive-Scientific Philosophy of Mind

November 15, 2017 Evan Thompson

This commentary engages with Dan Arnold's book, which examines the problem of intentionality—the aboutness of mental states—as it appears in classical Buddhist philosophy and contemporary cognitive science. The author discusses Arnold's argument that Buddhist thinkers, particularly Dharmakīrti, offer a distinctive perspective on intentionality that challenges reductive physicalist accounts in modern philosophy of mind. The commentary explores how taking Buddhist philosophy of mind seriously can illuminate debates about mental representation, causation, and the nature of belief, suggesting that cross-cultural philosophical dialogue enriches our understanding of these foundational issues.

Neurophenomenology and Contemplative Experience

Evan Thompson

Neurophenomenology combines first-person accounts of experience with third-person neuroscientific data to study contemplative practices. The chapter explains how this approach can deepen understanding of meditative states and their effects on consciousness, and discusses its implications for dialogues between science and religion. By integrating subjective reports with brain measurements, neurophenomenology offers a rigorous method for exploring the nature of mind and experience that bridges empirical science and contemplative traditions.