Skip to content

Charles D. Laughlin

Department of Sociology and Anthropology, Carleton University, Ottawa, ON K1S 5B6, Canada

7 papers in the library · 135 citations · publishing 1992-2024

Papers

Husserlian Meditations and Anthropological Reflections: Toward a Cultural Neurophenomenology of Experience and Reality

Anthropology of Consciousness September 1, 2009 Charles D. Laughlin, C. Jason Throop 45 citations

The experience-reality gap—the difference between how the world appears and its underlying reality—is recognized across cultures, yet Western philosophy has long struggled to explain it. This article proposes an anthropologically informed cultural neurophenomenology as a way to bridge that gap. The approach combines phenomenology that accounts for cultural differences in perception and interpretation with neuroscientific findings about brain structure. The authors argue that this integrated perspective offers a generative route to understanding the relationship between consciousness and reality.

Archetypes: Toward a Jungian Anthropology of Consciousness

Anthropology of Consciousness September 1, 2012 Charles D. Laughlin, Vincenza A. Tiberia 34 citations

Carl Jung's work has had surprisingly little impact on the anthropology of consciousness, despite its relevance. This paper explains why that oversight occurred, summarizes Jung's archetypal psychology, and argues it is more nuanced and valuable than extreme constructivist perspectives allow. Jung's ideas about consciousness align well with contemporary neuroscience views of the psyche and offer a corrective to relativist understandings of consciousness and its relationship to the self.

Conceptual Systems Theory: A Neglected Perspective for the Anthropology of Consciousness

Anthropology of Consciousness March 1, 2017 Charles D. Laughlin 27 citations

As anthropology turns toward consciousness and its varied states, it needs a way to analyze the complexity of information processing that produces the knowing aspect of consciousness. The author introduces conceptual systems theory (CST), a neo-Piagetian model of cognitive development, as a tool for this purpose. CST has successfully explained information processing in social contexts but has been overlooked by anthropologists. The article discusses CST's neuroanthropological foundations and its potential applications to ethnological and ethnographic problems, offering a new framework for understanding how components of consciousness combine into alternative states across different sociocultural settings.

Cultural Neurophenomenology: Integrating Experience, Culture and Reality Through Fisher Information

Culture & Psychology September 1, 2006 Charles D. Laughlin, C. Jason Throop 21 citations

The longstanding debate between anthropologists and psychologists over nature versus nurture has been hampered by a mind-body schism. Anthropologists often assume culture replaced biology, while psychologists tend to ignore culture in favor of a naive scientism. Bridging this divide requires a language that can simultaneously address individual experience, culture, and extramental reality. The authors propose a cultural neurophenomenology and argue that the concept of 'information'—specifically Fisher information—provides a unifying framework. Fisher information allows modeling interactions among experience, culture, and reality in commensurable terms and suggests mechanisms by which individual psyche and societal culture remain 'trued-up' to reality and the individual's own being.

Time, Intentionality, and a Neurophenomenology of the Dot

Anthropology of Consciousness July 1, 1992 Charles D. Laughlin 6 citations

This paper argues that Husserl's transcendental phenomenology has a systematic bias favoring intuition of essences of meaning over intuition of essences of sensation, a bias rooted in his mind-body dualism. It proposes a neurophenomenology from a biogenetic structural perspective that merges knowledge of essences from contemplation with knowledge of experience from neuroanthropology. The author describes the sensorium and the constituent element of perception, the dot, hypothesizing that experience arises from dialogue between prefrontal cortical processes and sensorial processes, with experience constituted within a field of dots arising and dissolving in temporal frames. Husserl's view of time phenomenology is deemed essentially correct and compatible with neurophysiology, modern science, and religious traditions encountered by ethnographers.

Husserlian Neurophenomenology: Grounding the Anthropology of Experience in Reality

Humans February 17, 2024 Charles D. Laughlin 1 citation

Anthropology has historically avoided becoming a nomothetic science, missing chances to build empirical theoretical constructs and instead retreating into a natural history of sociocultural differences. This paper argues for methods that focus the ethnographic gaze on essential structures of perception alongside cultural variation. The anthropology of experience and the senses can incorporate a partnership between Husserlian phenomenology and neuroscience to evidence essential structures of consciousness and the neurobiological processes that present the world as adaptively real. Combining essences—sensory objects, relations, horizons, and intuitions—with the search for neural correlates of consciousness can augment traditional ethnography and counter the constructivist bias that reduces everything to culture.

Intersubjectivity, Empathy, Life‐World, and the Social Brain: The Relevance of Husserlian Neurophenomenology for the Anthropology of Consciousness

Anthropology of Consciousness March 1, 2023 Charles D. Laughlin 1 citation

Husserlian phenomenology offers a methodological approach to social consciousness that aligns with neuroscientific research on neural correlates of consciousness, particularly in the post-neuro-turn social science era. By emphasizing "returning to the things," performing reductions, and developing the phenomenological attitude, this approach allows anthropology to explore consciousness cross-culturally with greater depth, especially regarding intersubjectivity. The roots of intersubjectivity are found within the inherent life-world that all normal humans rely on to validate their experiences, regardless of cultural background. This challenges anthropology to move beyond the nature-nurture distinction and the assumption that human experience is entirely culturally constructed.