Skip to content

Frontiers in computational neuroscience

ISSN 1662-5188

3 papers in the library · 41 citations · publishing 2021-2023

Papers

A Neuroscience Levels of Explanation Approach to the Mind and the Brain.

Frontiers in computational neuroscience January 1, 2021 Edmund T Rolls 19 citations

Mental states and brain states are linked by a non-causal supervenient relationship, not by direct causation. Events at sub-neuronal, neuronal, and network levels occur simultaneously to perform computations describable as mental states with content about the world. Causality operates within levels of explanation but not between them, allowing mental properties to be emergent yet mechanistically expected. This theory avoids dualism and reductive physicalism, rooted in computational processes. For arithmetic, mental-level algorithmic descriptions are useful; for psychiatric disorders, understanding neural mechanisms aids treatment.

Mind Causality: A Computational Neuroscience Approach.

Frontiers in computational neuroscience January 1, 2021 Edmund T Rolls 17 citations

A computational neuroscience theory of mind-brain relations proposes that mental states are high-level descriptions of simultaneous sub-neuronal, neuronal, and network-level computations. These levels are linked by non-causal supervenience, not causation; causality operates only within levels, not between them. The theory requires causality to satisfy three conditions: interventionist tests, same-level events, and a temporal order with a timescale of about 10 ms. While mental-level causal descriptions can be useful, brain-level accounts may be more accurate because mental-level accounts can involve confabulation. Cases of apparent downward causation are reinterpreted as within-level causation. This approach offers a path beyond Cartesian dualism and physical reductionism.

Consciousness, 4E cognition and Aristotle: a few conceptual and historical aspects.

Frontiers in computational neuroscience January 1, 2023 Diana Stanciu 5 citations

The new approach in cognitive science known as 4E cognition (embodied, embedded, enactive, extended) may revive certain Aristotelian concepts, particularly his notion of nature as an inner impulse to movement that is neither fully corporeal nor incorporeal, and his distinction between active and passive intellect. By analyzing Aristotle's definitions in Physics, On the Parts of Animals, and On the Soul, the author argues that the mind-body problem central to explaining consciousness can be partially eluded or transcended through a subtle account of causation. Recent neuroscience findings on consciousness could be better understood within a 4E cognition paradigm inspired by these Aristotelian views.