Skip to content

Sina Nikayin

Department of Psychiatry, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA; Yale Depression Research Program (YDRP), Yale University, New Haven, CT 06511, USA; Interventional Psychiatry Services, Yale Psychiatry Hospital, New Haven, CT 06519, USA. Electronic address: sina.nikayin@yale.edu.

5 papers in the library · 314 citations · publishing 2023-2025

Papers

Ketamine versus ECT for Nonpsychotic Treatment-Resistant Major Depression.

New England Journal of Medicine May 24, 2023 A. Anand, S. Mathew, G. Sanacora et al. 263 citations

For treatment-resistant major depression without psychosis, intravenous ketamine is at least as effective as electroconvulsive therapy (ECT). In a randomized trial with 403 patients, 55.4% of those receiving ketamine and 41.2% of those receiving ECT showed a 50% or greater reduction in depression scores over three weeks. ECT was linked to a notable decline in memory recall after three weeks (average decrease of 9.7 points on a memory test vs. 0.9 points with ketamine), with gradual recovery during follow-up. Quality-of-life improvements were similar between groups. Ketamine caused dissociation, while ECT led to musculoskeletal side effects.

Ketamine vs Electroconvulsive Therapy for Treatment-Resistant Depression: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial.

JAMA network open June 3, 2024 Manish Kumar Jha, Samuel T Wilkinson, Kamini Krishnan et al. 29 citations

In people with treatment-resistant depression who do not have psychosis, intravenous ketamine works as well as electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) overall. Among outpatients with moderately severe or severe depression, ketamine produced greater improvement in depressive symptoms than ECT. In contrast, inpatients with very severe depression improved more with ECT early in treatment, though by the end of the three-week course both treatments were similarly effective. Higher premorbid intelligence and a diagnosis of posttraumatic stress disorder were linked to greater improvement with ECT, but not with ketamine. These findings may help patients and clinicians decide between the two treatments.

Efficacy and Safety of Ketamine/Esketamine in Bipolar Depression in a Clinical Setting.

The Journal of clinical psychiatry October 2, 2024 Mia C Santucci, Mina Ansari, Sina Nikayin et al. 12 citations

In a real-world clinical setting, 45 patients with treatment-resistant bipolar depression received intravenous ketamine or intranasal esketamine. Among 38 who completed an acute series (twice-weekly treatments for up to four weeks), 39% achieved a clinical response (at least 50% improvement on the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale) and 13.2% achieved remission (score of 10 or lower). Mean depression scores dropped from 31.1 to 19.2, a 38.3% improvement. No manic or hypomanic episodes occurred during the acute phase. However, during maintenance treatment, 28.9% of patients experienced hypomanic or manic symptoms, with one severe event requiring hospitalization.

Blood pressure changes during ketamine infusion for the treatment of depression.

General hospital psychiatry January 1, 2024 Mina Ansari, Brian Pittman, Daniel S Tylee et al. 6 citations

Blood pressure increases during ketamine infusion for depression, peaking at 40 minutes with average rises of 16.0 mmHg systolic and 11.0 mmHg diastolic. Severe hypertension occurred in 12.5% of patients and 0.98% of infusion sessions, most often during the first three treatments. Older age and a history of hypertension were associated with larger blood pressure surges, indicating that careful cardiovascular monitoring is needed, especially for these patients.

Does BMI matter when treating depression with esketamine? A retrospective analysis of real-world data.

Journal of affective disorders July 15, 2025 Mina Ansari, Taeho Greg Rhee, Mia C Santucci et al. 4 citations

Patients with obesity were significantly more likely to respond to intranasal esketamine for treatment-resistant depression than non-obese patients. Among 190 patients treated at a single clinic, 34.2% were obese. Obese patients had a 63% higher chance of achieving at least a 50% improvement on the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale compared to non-obese patients. However, when BMI was analyzed as a continuous measure, no linear relationship with treatment response was found. The authors suggest that increased body fat may prolong the presence of lipid-soluble esketamine or its metabolites, but the underlying mechanisms remain unknown.