Skip to content

Daniel D. Hutto

Law, Humanities, and the Arts, University of Hertfordshire

6 papers in the library · 1,017 citations · publishing 2012-2025

Papers

Radicalizing Enactivism

The MIT Press eBooks December 14, 2012 Daniel D. Hutto, Erik Myin 515 citations

Basic forms of mentality—intentionally directed cognition and perceptual experience—are best understood as embodied yet contentless. Most human doing and experiencing involves dynamically unfolding interactions with the environment. Many philosophers and cognitive scientists acknowledge the importance of situated, embodied engagements for understanding basic minds, but hold that such minds are necessarily contentful—that they represent conditions the world might be in. This book promotes a radically enactive, embodied approach: some kinds of minds are neither best explained by processes involving the manipulation of contents nor inherently contentful. It defends the thesis that there can be intentionality and phenomenal experience without content, and demonstrates advantages for thinking about scaffolded minds and consciousness.

Evolving Enactivism

The MIT Press eBooks May 19, 2017 Daniel D. Hutto, Erik Myin 482 citations

Cognition can be divided into two basic types: contentless, interactive forms and content-involving forms. The most elementary cognitive processes—perceiving, imagining, remembering—do not require picking up, storing, or representing information in the brain. Instead, they are fundamentally dynamic, relational, and contentless. Only some forms of cognition involve content. This duplex account of the mind offers a naturalistic explanation of basic minds without introducing scientifically intractable mysteries.

Going Radical

The Oxford Handbook of 4E Cognition October 9, 2018 Daniel D. Hutto, Erik Myin 15 citations

Radical versions of enactive, embodied, and ecological approaches to cognition, which seek to replace rather than complement traditional cognitivist accounts, may offer a genuine conceptual revolution. This chapter evaluates the major options proposed by E-theorists, rating each by radicality. It reviews the hard problem of content and argues that adopting a radical approach is one of the most attractive ways to address it, opening up a positive research program worth exploring.

Beyond the extended mind: new arguments for extensive enactivism

Synthese March 1, 2025 Lorena Sganzerla, Daniel D. Hutto, Michael D. Kirchhoff 5 citations

The extended mind thesis holds that cognitive processes can extend beyond the brain to include parts of the body and environment under certain conditions. This paper revives and clarifies the commitments of Radical Enactivism's Extensive Enactivism, compares it to related frameworks like embodied and distributed cognition, and provides new arguments for preferring it over other positions in the extended-distributed-enactive family.

RECtifying and REConnecting

Evolving Enactivism May 19, 2017 Daniel D. Hutto, Erik Myin

Chapter 4 demonstrates how the Radical Enactive Cognition (REC) framework can be applied to two existing nonrepresentational approaches to cognition: Autopoietic-Adaptive Enactivism and Ecological Dynamics. By 'RECtifying' these approaches, the chapter shows that REC can combine their resources to explain basic minds in naturalistic terms. The chapter concludes by addressing the need to explain how basic, contentless minds can develop into contentful minds—a process called REConnecting. This is necessary because REC holds that some cognition involves content and that organisms acquire content-involving cognition by mastering specific sociocultural practices.

Revolution in Mind?

Evolving Enactivism May 19, 2017 Daniel D. Hutto, Erik Myin

The chapter introduces the 'E-turn' in cognitive science—the shift toward enactive, embodied, extended, and ecological views of cognition—and the empirical and theoretical developments that prompted it. It contrasts E-approaches with classical cognitivism, particularly in how far they depart from commitments to representationalism, computationalism, and mechanistic explanation. Against this backdrop, the chapter argues that REC's proposal is not merely revisionary but revolutionary. It also outlines the basic rules of naturalistic play, cautioning that dismissing REC based on a priori intuitions about cognition's essence violates naturalistic methodological principles.