Skip to content

Axel Constant

School of Engineering and Informatics, University of Sussex, Sussex House, Falmer, East Sussex BN1 9RH, United Kingdom.

4 papers in the library · 549 citations · publishing 2019-2024

Papers

Thinking through other minds: A variational approach to cognition and culture.

The Behavioral and brain sciences May 30, 2019 Samuel P L Veissière, Axel Constant, Maxwell J D Ramstead et al. 362 citations

A unifying account of how humans acquire shared cultural habits, norms, and expectations is developed by integrating the variational free-energy principle from theoretical neuroscience with concepts of cultural evolution and implicit learning. Humans construct social niches that provide epistemic resources called cultural affordances. Through immersive participation in patterned cultural practices, agents learn by inferring what other people expect—a process termed "thinking through other minds" (TTOM). This makes information about others' expectations the primary statistical regularity humans use to predict and organize behavior. The model aims to resolve debates in cognitive science between internalist and externalist accounts of theory of mind and between dynamical and representational views of enactivism.

The first prior: From co-embodiment to co-homeostasis in early life.

Consciousness and cognition May 1, 2021 Anna Ciaunica, Axel Constant, Hubert Preissl et al. 99 citations

Perceptual experiences are shaped by prior events, as argued by Predictive Processing and Active Inference frameworks. This paper examines how such experiences begin before birth, within the womb. A key but often neglected point is that humans develop inside another human body, a universal experience. The authors focus on the emergence of minimal selfhood in utero as a process of co-embodiment and co-homeostasis, emphasizing their interdependence. They conclude by discussing implications for debates on conscious experience, the minimal self, and social cognition.

From Generative Models to Generative Passages: A Computational Approach to (Neuro) Phenomenology.

Review of philosophy and psychology January 1, 2022 Maxwell J D Ramstead, Anil K Seth, Casper Hesp et al. 75 citations

A version of neurophenomenology is presented that uses generative modelling techniques from computational neuroscience and biology to formally model descriptions of lived experience from the phenomenological tradition (e.g., Husserl, Merleau-Ponty). The approach, called computational phenomenology, is situated within the broader project of naturalizing phenomenology. Philosophical objections to that project are evaluated, and the generative modelling framework is reviewed. The approach differs from previous uses of generative modelling for consciousness by constructing computational models of inferential or interpretive processes that best explain particular kinds of lived experience.

Sources of richness and ineffability for phenomenally conscious states.

Neuroscience of consciousness January 1, 2024 Xu Ji, Eric Elmoznino, George Deane et al. 13 citations

Conscious experiences feel rich and hard to fully describe or recall, a puzzle that partly motivates the explanatory gap—the belief that consciousness cannot be reduced to physical processes. This work offers an information-theoretic dynamical systems framework: richness corresponds to the amount of information in a conscious state, and ineffability to information lost during processing. Attractor dynamics in working memory cause impoverished recollections, language's discrete symbolic nature cannot capture high-dimensional experiential structure, and similar cognitive function between individuals improves communicability. The model advances a physicalist explanation of these puzzling aspects, though it may not settle all questions about the explanatory gap.